These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23717348)

  • 1. Retrospective perceptual distortion of position representation does not lead to delayed localization.
    Au RK; Ono F; Watanabe K
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2013; 9(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 23717348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal course of position shift for a peripheral target.
    Yamada Y; Miura K; Kawabe T
    J Vis; 2011 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 21562033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial distortion induced by imperceptible visual stimuli.
    Au RK; Ono F; Watanabe K
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Mar; 22(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 23262255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mislocalization of visual stimuli: independent effects of static and dynamic attention.
    Chien SE; Ono F; Watanabe K
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e28371. PubMed ID: 22163009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modulating the attentional repulsion effect.
    Pratt J; Arnott SR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):137-45. PubMed ID: 17490594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orienting of attention with and without cue awareness.
    Herreros L; Lambert AJ; Chica AB
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 May; 99():165-171. PubMed ID: 28284987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical regularities cause attentional suppression with target-matching distractors.
    Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):270-282. PubMed ID: 33251562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contingent capture can occur at specific feature values: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Jiao J; Zhao G; Wang Q; Zhang K; Li H; Sun HJ; Liu Q
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Feb; 92(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 23069637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple attentional control settings at distinct locations without the confounding of repetition priming.
    Cho SA; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1718-1730. PubMed ID: 29959663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus-driven attentional capture by subliminal onset cues.
    Schoeberl T; Fuchs I; Theeuwes J; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):737-48. PubMed ID: 25520044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of lateralized cues on the processing of lateralized auditory stimuli.
    Schröger E; Eimer M
    Biol Psychol; 1996 Jun; 43(3):203-26. PubMed ID: 8831955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A finer-grained search reveals no evidence of the attentional capture by to-be-ignored features.
    Rheem H; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2441-2457. PubMed ID: 33913088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional capture by a color singleton is stronger at spatially relevant than irrelevant locations: Evidence from an ERP study.
    Su Y; Huang W; Yang N; Yan K; Ding Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Oct; 57(10):e13640. PubMed ID: 33460208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention can retrospectively distort visual space.
    Ono F; Watanabe K
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Apr; 22(4):472-7. PubMed ID: 21441225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional set modulates visual areas: an event-related potential study of attentional capture.
    Arnott SR; Pratt J; Shore DI; Alain C
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Dec; 12(3):383-95. PubMed ID: 11689298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contingent Attentional Engagement: Stimulus- and Goal-Driven Capture Have Qualitatively Different Consequences.
    Zivony A; Lamy D
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1930-1941. PubMed ID: 30285577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The precision of attentional selection is far worse than the precision of the underlying memory representation.
    Kerzel D
    Cognition; 2019 May; 186():20-31. PubMed ID: 30739056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modulating the attentional bias in unilateral neglect: the effects of the strategic set.
    Bartolomeo P; Siéroff E; Decaix C; Chokron S
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 137(3-4):432-44. PubMed ID: 11355388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feature-based attention elicited by precueing in an orientation discrimination task.
    Huang D; Xue L; Wang M; Hu Q; Bu X; Chen Y
    Vision Res; 2018 Jul; 148():15-25. PubMed ID: 29763696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.