These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23717348)

  • 21. Detection costs and contingent attentional capture.
    Schönhammer JG; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):429-437. PubMed ID: 27896707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of relevant and irrelevant color singletons on inhibition of return and attentional capture.
    Ansorge U; Priess HW; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1687-702. PubMed ID: 24027028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An attentional grasp reflex in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
    Maruff P; Currie J
    Neuropsychologia; 1995 Jun; 33(6):689-701. PubMed ID: 7675161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attentional localization prior to simple and directed manual responses.
    Hodgson TL; Müller HJ; O'Leary MJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Feb; 61(2):308-21. PubMed ID: 10089763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The impact of temporal contingencies between cue and target onset on spatial attentional capture by subliminal onset cues.
    Schoeberl T; Ansorge U
    Psychol Res; 2019 Oct; 83(7):1416-1425. PubMed ID: 29766295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attentional priming and visual search in pigeons.
    Blough PM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1989 Oct; 15(4):358-65. PubMed ID: 2794871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Direct evidence for the optimal tuning of attention.
    Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Jul; 46(7):716-728. PubMed ID: 32271080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The attentional effects of single cues and color singletons on visual sensitivity.
    White AL; Lunau R; Carrasco M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):639-52. PubMed ID: 23875570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Depth modulation of the attentional repulsion effect.
    Chien SE; Watanabe K
    Perception; 2013; 42(12):1333-43. PubMed ID: 24649635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.
    Dombert PL; Fink GR; Vossel S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):685-94. PubMed ID: 26586268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Attentional selection is biased towards controllable stimuli.
    Huffman G; Brockmole JR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2558-2569. PubMed ID: 32166643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. There is more to trial history than priming in attentional capture experiments.
    Goller F; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1574-84. PubMed ID: 25832193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Stimulus-driven attentional capture by a static discontinuity between perceptual groups.
    Burnham BR; Neely JH; Naginsky Y; Thomas M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):317-29. PubMed ID: 20364921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Goal-driven modulation of stimulus-driven attentional capture in multiple-cue displays.
    Richard CM; Wright RD; Ward LM
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Aug; 65(6):939-55. PubMed ID: 14528901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attentional capture by context cues, not inhibition of cue singletons, explains same location costs.
    Schönhammer JG; Becker SI; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Jun; 46(6):610-628. PubMed ID: 32191113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Strategic control modulates working memory-driven attentional capture.
    Kuo CY; Chao HF; Yeh YY
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 22851381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Investigating the role of exogenous cueing on selection history formation.
    Grubb MA; Christensen G; Albanese J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1282-1288. PubMed ID: 30924059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cholinergic modulation of covert attention in the rat.
    Stewart C; Burke S; Marrocco R
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2001 May; 155(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 11401012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A unitary focus of spatial attention during attentional capture: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Grubert A; Righi LL; Eimer M
    J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(3):9. PubMed ID: 23641076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Contingent capture effects in temporal order judgments.
    Born S; Kerzel D; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):995-1006. PubMed ID: 25938252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.