153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23717402)
1. Reach and cost-effectiveness of the PrePex device for safe male circumcision in Uganda.
Duffy K; Galukande M; Wooding N; Dea M; Coutinho A
PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e63134. PubMed ID: 23717402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adverse events profile of PrePex a non-surgical device for adult male circumcision in a Ugandan urban setting.
Galukande M; Duffy K; Bitega JP; Rackara S; Bbaale DS; Nakaggwa F; Nagaddya T; Wooding N; Dea M; Coutinho A
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86631. PubMed ID: 24489754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost analysis of integrating the PrePex medical device into a voluntary medical male circumcision program in Zimbabwe.
Njeuhmeli E; Kripke K; Hatzold K; Reed J; Edgil D; Jaramillo J; Castor D; Forsythe S; Xaba S; Mugurungi O
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e82533. PubMed ID: 24801515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skills training of health workers in the use of a non surgical device (PrePex) for adult Safe Male Circumcision.
Galukande M; Duffy K; Bitega JP; Wooding N
PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e104893. PubMed ID: 25118716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex™ Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe.
Tshimanga M; Mangwiro T; Mugurungi O; Xaba S; Murwira M; Kasprzyk D; Montaño DE; Nyamukapa D; Tambashe B; Chatikobo P; Gundidza P; Gwinji G
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0156220. PubMed ID: 27227679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the cost of adult voluntary medical male circumcision in a mixed (surgical and PrePex) site compared to a hypothetical PrePex-only site in South Africa.
Kim HY; Lebina L; Milovanovic M; Taruberekera N; Dowdy DW; Martinson NA
Glob Health Action; 2015; 8():29116. PubMed ID: 26679407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adverse event profile of a mature voluntary medical male circumcision programme performing PrePex and surgical procedures in Zimbabwe.
Bochner AF; Feldacker C; Makunike B; Holec M; Murenje V; Stepaniak A; Xaba S; Balachandra S; Tshimanga M; Chitimbire V; Barnhart S
J Int AIDS Soc; 2017 Feb; 19(1):21394. PubMed ID: 28362066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The PrePex device is unlikely to achieve cost-savings compared to the forceps-guided method in male circumcision programs in sub-Saharan Africa.
Obiero W; Young MR; Bailey RC
PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e53380. PubMed ID: 23349708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative Cost Analysis of Surgical and PrePex Device Male Circumcision in Zimbabwe and Mozambique.
Schutte C; Tshimanga M; Mugurungi O; Come I; Necochea E; Mahomed M; Xaba S; Bossemeyer D; Ferreira T; Macaringue L; Chatikobo P; Gundididza P; Hatzold K
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2016 Jun; 72 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S96-S100. PubMed ID: 27331599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The safety and acceptance of the PrePex device for non-surgical adult male circumcision in Rakai, Uganda. A non-randomized observational study.
Kigozi G; Musoke R; Watya S; Kighoma N; Nkale J; Nakafeero M; Namuguzi D; Serwada D; Nalugoda F; Sewankambo N; Wawer MJ; Gray RH
PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e100008. PubMed ID: 25144194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating Opportunities for Achieving Cost Efficiencies Through the Introduction of PrePex Device Male Circumcision in Adult VMMC Programs in Zambia and Zimbabwe.
Vandament L; Chintu N; Yano N; Mugurungi O; Tambatamba B; Ncube G; Xaba S; Mpasela F; Muguza E; Mangono T; Madidi N; Samona A; Tagar E; Hatzold K
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2016 Jun; 72 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S90-5. PubMed ID: 27331598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. One-arm, open-label, prospective, cohort field study to assess the safety and efficacy of the PrePex device for scale-up of nonsurgical circumcision when performed by nurses in resource-limited settings for HIV prevention.
Mutabazi V; Kaplan SA; Rwamasirabo E; Bitega JP; Ngeruka ML; Savio D; Karema C; Binagwaho A
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2013 Jul; 63(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 23466648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost Analysis of Adult Male Circumcision with the PrePex Device versus Surgery in Rwanda.
Mutabazi V; Bitega JP; Muyenzi Ngeruka L; Nyemazi JP; Dain M; Kaplan SA; Karema C; Binagwaho A
Urol Nurs; 2014; 34(6):303-11. PubMed ID: 26298926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Piloting PrePex for Adult and Adolescent Male Circumcision in South Africa--Pain Is an Issue.
Lebina L; Taruberekera N; Milovanovic M; Hatzold K; Mhazo M; Nhlapo C; Tshabangu N; Manentsa M; Kazangarare V; Makola M; Billy S; Martinson N
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138755. PubMed ID: 26405786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is the PrePex device an alternative for surgical male circumcision in adolescents ages 13-17 years? Findings from routine service delivery during active surveillance in Zimbabwe.
Mavhu W; Hatzold K; Madidi N; Maponga B; Dhlamini R; Munjoma M; Xaba S; Ncube G; Mugurungi O; Cowan FM
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213399. PubMed ID: 30856228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Safety Profile of PrePex Male Circumcision Device and Client Satisfaction With Adolescent Males Aged 13-17 Years in Zimbabwe.
Tshimanga M; Hatzold K; Mugurungi O; Mangwiro T; Ncube G; Xaba S; Chatikobo P; Gundidza P; Samkange C; Dhlamini R; Murwira M; Gwinji G
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2016 Jun; 72 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S36-42. PubMed ID: 27331588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genital Anaerobic Bacterial Overgrowth and the PrePex Male Circumcision Device, Rakai, Uganda.
Liu CM; Prodger JL; Tobian AA; Serwadda D; Galiwango RM; Nalugoda F; Kighoma N; Mwinike J; Anyokorit M; Price LB; Wawer MJ; Kigozi G; Gray RH
J Infect Dis; 2016 Aug; 214(4):595-8. PubMed ID: 27190185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptions of the PrePex Device Among Men Who Received or Refused PrePex Circumcision and People Accompanying Them.
Milovanovic M; Taruberekera N; Martinson N; Lebina L
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2016 Jun; 72 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S78-82. PubMed ID: 27331596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pediatric sutureless circumcision: an effective and cost efficient alternative.
Voznesensky M; Mutter C; Hayn M; Kinkead T; Jumper B
Can J Urol; 2015 Oct; 22(5):7995-9. PubMed ID: 26432971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of male circumcision for HIV prevention in a South African setting.
Kahn JG; Marseille E; Auvert B
PLoS Med; 2006 Dec; 3(12):e517. PubMed ID: 17194197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
