These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23717611)

  • 1. Water ecosystem services in northern Australia--how much are they worth and who should pay for their provision?
    Zander KK; Parkes R; Straton A; Garnett ST
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e64411. PubMed ID: 23717611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trade-offs between development, culture and conservation--willingness to pay for tropical river management among urban Australians.
    Zander KK; Garnett ST; Straton A
    J Environ Manage; 2010 Dec; 91(12):2519-28. PubMed ID: 20724063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial prioritization of willingness to pay for ecosystem services. A novel notion of distance from origin's impression.
    Khan SU; Liu G; Zhao M; Chien H; Lu Q; Khan AA; Ali MAS; Misbahullah
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jan; 27(3):3100-3112. PubMed ID: 31838703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services: a distance decay approach to quantify willingness to pay for improvements in Heihe River Basin ecosystems.
    Khan SU; Khan I; Zhao M; Chien H; Lu Q; Ali MAS; Khan AA; Fahad S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Aug; 26(24):25247-25261. PubMed ID: 31256403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prioritizing stakeholders' preferences for policy scenarios of vulnerable ecosystems with spatial heterogeneity in choice experiment: Coupling stated preferences with elevation.
    Khan A; Khan SU; Ali MAS; Khan AA; Zhao M
    J Environ Manage; 2022 May; 310():114757. PubMed ID: 35220093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantifying preferences for the natural world using monetary and nonmonetary assessments of value.
    Dallimer M; Tinch D; Hanley N; Irvine KN; Rouquette JR; Warren PH; Maltby L; Gaston KJ; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Apr; 28(2):404-13. PubMed ID: 24372643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Valuing visitor access to forested areas and exploring willingness to pay for forest conservation and restoration finance: The case of small island developing state of Mauritius.
    Iranah P; Lal P; Wolde BT; Burli P
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Oct; 223():868-877. PubMed ID: 29986336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Paying for Forest Ecosystem Services: Voluntary Versus Mandatory Payments.
    Roesch-McNally GE; Rabotyagov SS
    Environ Manage; 2016 Mar; 57(3):585-600. PubMed ID: 26661136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Water resource management and public preferences for water ecosystem services: A choice experiment approach for inland river basin management.
    Khan I; Zhao M
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jan; 646():821-831. PubMed ID: 30064108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does location of the households' matters? Identifying the households' willingness to pay and preference heterogeneity in advancement of vulnerable ecosystem services: An approach of choice experiment.
    Ali MAS; Zhang Z; Khan SU; Khan AA; Musa M; Rahman P; Hayat Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(11):29859-29873. PubMed ID: 36422782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-use Economic Values for Little-Known Aquatic Species at Risk: Comparing Choice Experiment Results from Surveys Focused on Species, Guilds, and Ecosystems.
    Rudd MA; Andres S; Kilfoil M
    Environ Manage; 2016 Sep; 58(3):476-90. PubMed ID: 27294723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ecological degradation of an inland river basin and an evaluation of the spatial and distance effect on willingness to pay for its improvement.
    Khan I; Zhao M; Khan SU
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Nov; 25(31):31474-31485. PubMed ID: 30203347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Willingness to pay for ecosystem services of urban river in Shanghai].
    Zhao J; Yang K; Tai J; Wu EN
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2005 Mar; 26(2):5-10. PubMed ID: 16004291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of perceived importance of ecosystem services and stated financial constraints on willingness to pay for riparian meadow restoration in Flanders (Belgium).
    Chen WY; Aertsens J; Liekens I; Broekx S; De Nocker L
    Environ Manage; 2014 Aug; 54(2):346-59. PubMed ID: 24841691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Economic Value of the Greater Montreal Blue Network (Quebec, Canada): A Contingent Choice Study Using Real Projects to Estimate Non-Market Aquatic Ecosystem Services Benefits.
    Poder TG; Dupras J; Fetue Ndefo F; He J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0158901. PubMed ID: 27513558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Households' preferences for hydrological services in Veracruz, Mexico: The importance of outcomes vs. program design.
    McGinnis I; Atallah SS; Huang JC
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Dec; 300():113763. PubMed ID: 34649329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Land use efficiency: anticipating future demand for land-sector greenhouse gas emissions abatement and managing trade-offs with agriculture, water, and biodiversity.
    Bryan BA; Crossman ND; Nolan M; Li J; Navarro J; Connor JD
    Glob Chang Biol; 2015 Nov; 21(11):4098-114. PubMed ID: 26147156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Value orientation and payment for ecosystem services: Perceived detrimental consequences lead to willingness-to-pay for ecosystem services.
    Obeng EA; Aguilar FX
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jan; 206():458-471. PubMed ID: 29107802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using Optimal Land-Use Scenarios to Assess Trade-Offs between Conservation, Development, and Social Values.
    Adams VM; Pressey RL; Álvarez-Romero JG
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0158350. PubMed ID: 27362347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using a choice experiment and birder preferences to guide bird-conservation funding.
    Steven R; Smart JCR; Morrison C; Castley JG
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Aug; 31(4):818-827. PubMed ID: 27696549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.