207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23718131)
1. The influence of implant geometry and surface composition on bone response.
AlFarraj Aldosari A; Anil S; Alasqah M; Al Wazzan KA; Al Jetaily SA; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 23718131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study of the bone contact to zirconium and titanium implants after 8 weeks of implantation in rabbit femoral condyles.
AlFarraj AA; Sukumaran A; Al Amri MD; Van Oirschot AB; Jansen JA
Odontology; 2018 Jan; 106(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 28194543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combined Treatment Effects Using Bioactive-Coated Implants and Ceramic Granulate in a Rabbit Femoral Condyle Model.
Preethanath RS; Rajesh P; Varma H; Anil S; Jansen JA; van den Beucken JJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Aug; 18(4):666-77. PubMed ID: 26115085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo evaluation of bioactive glass-based coatings on dental implants in a dog implantation model.
van Oirschot BA; Alghamdi HS; Närhi TO; Anil S; Al Farraj Aldosari A; van den Beucken JJ; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 23078340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of magnesium-substituted nanohydroxyapatite coating on implant osseointegration.
Zhao SF; Jiang QH; Peel S; Wang XX; He FM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():34-41. PubMed ID: 22145854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomimetic calcium phosphate composite coating of dental implants.
Schliephake H; Scharnweber D; Roesseler S; Dard M; Sewing A; Aref A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):738-46. PubMed ID: 17066635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated dental implants display better bone formation in the peri-implant area than the same combination plus bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated implants, hydroxyapatite only coated implants, and uncoated implants.
Lee SW; Hahn BD; Kang TY; Lee MJ; Choi JY; Kim MK; Kim SG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 24331565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits.
Piattelli M; Scarano A; Paolantonio M; Iezzi G; Petrone G; Piattelli A
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12498456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Calcium-phosphate-coated oral implants promote osseointegration in osteoporosis.
Alghamdi HS; Cuijpers VM; Wolke JG; van den Beucken JJ; Jansen JA
J Dent Res; 2013 Nov; 92(11):982-8. PubMed ID: 24056224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trabecular bone response to titanium implants with a thin carbonate-containing apatite coating applied using the molecular precursor method.
Hayakawa T; Takahashi K; Yoshinari M; Okada H; Yamamoto H; Sato M; Nemoto K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):851-8. PubMed ID: 17190294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. II. Histologic analysis.
Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):933-49. PubMed ID: 9358360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical and morphometric analysis of hydroxyapatite-coated implants with varying crystallinity.
Chang YL; Lew D; Park JB; Keller JC
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Sep; 57(9):1096-108; discussion 1108-9. PubMed ID: 10484111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of implant geometry, surface properties, and TGF-beta1 on peri-implant bone response: an experimental study in goats.
Schouten C; Meijer GJ; van den Beucken JJ; Spauwen PH; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):421-9. PubMed ID: 19298297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone-supportive behavior of microplasma-sprayed CaP-coated implants: mechanical and histological outcome in the goat.
Junker R; Manders PJ; Wolke J; Borisov Y; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):189-200. PubMed ID: 19958376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Peri-implant bone formations around (Ti,Zr)O(2) -coated zirconia implants with different surface roughness.
Chung SH; Kim HK; Shon WJ; Park YS
J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Apr; 40(4):404-11. PubMed ID: 23425208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical comparison of biomimetically and electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite-coated porous titanium implants.
Yang GL; He FM; Hu JA; Wang XX; Zhao SF
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 68(2):420-7. PubMed ID: 20116717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early bone healing around 2 different experimental, HA grit-blasted, and dual acid-etched titanium implant surfaces. A pilot study in rabbits.
Gobbato L; Arguello E; Martin IS; Hawley CE; Griffin TJ
Implant Dent; 2012 Dec; 21(6):454-60. PubMed ID: 23149502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Osseointegration of one-piece zirconia implants compared with a titanium implant of identical design: a histomorphometric study in the dog.
Koch FP; Weng D; Krämer S; Biesterfeld S; Jahn-Eimermacher A; Wagner W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Mar; 21(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 20074240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
