207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23718131)
41. An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces.
Gottlow J; Barkarmo S; Sennerby L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e204-12. PubMed ID: 22487460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. An in vivo analysis of an elliptical dental implant design.
Cook SD; Salkeld SL; Gaisser DM; Wagner WR
J Oral Implantol; 1993; 19(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 8007024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The osseointegration stimulatory effect of macrogeometry-modified implants: a study in the rabbit.
Chowdhary R; Jimbo R; Thomsen CS; Carlsson L; Wennerberg A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1051-5. PubMed ID: 23782296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Secondary stability of microthickness hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants installed without primary stability in dogs.
Jung UW; Kim S; Lee IK; Kim MS; Lee JS; Kim HJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Oct; 25(10):1169-74. PubMed ID: 23822196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Histomorphometric evaluation of six dental implant surfaces after early loading in augmented human sinuses.
Todisco M; Trisi P
J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(4):153-66. PubMed ID: 17009559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Bone response to the multilayer BMP-2 gene coated porous titanium implant surface.
Jiang QH; Liu L; Peel S; Yang GL; Zhao SF; He FM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):853-61. PubMed ID: 22168601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Histomorphometric analyses of hydroxyapatite-coated and uncoated titanium implants. The importance of the implant design.
Gottlander M; Albrektsson T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1992 Jun; 3(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 15900671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Influence of implant geometry and surface characteristics on progressive osseointegration.
Geurs NC; Jeffcoat RL; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Jeffcoat MK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 12507240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The effect of chemical and nanotopographical modifications on the early stages of osseointegration.
Meirelles L; Currie F; Jacobsson M; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):641-7. PubMed ID: 18807559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Promotion of osseointegration of anodized titanium implants with a 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 submicron particle coating.
Cho YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Lee SJ; Lee JH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1225-32. PubMed ID: 22167427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant.
He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Bone healing capacity of titanium plasma-sprayed and hydroxylapatite-coated oral implants.
Vercaigne S; Wolke JG; Naert I; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Aug; 9(4):261-71. PubMed ID: 9760901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Histological evaluation of oral implants inserted with different surgical techniques into the trabecular bone of goats.
Shalabi MM; Wolke JG; de Ruijter AJ; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Aug; 18(4):489-95. PubMed ID: 17517059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants.
Sul YT; Jönsson J; Yoon GS; Johansson C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1146-55. PubMed ID: 19719742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The relative effect of surface strontium chemistry and super-hydrophilicity on the early osseointegration of moderately rough titanium surface in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Kwon TG; Suh JY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):706-9. PubMed ID: 22409778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Long-term effects of magnetron-sputtered calcium phosphate coating on osseointegration of dental implants in non-human primates.
Fügl A; Ulm C; Tangl S; Vasak C; Gruber R; Watzek G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 19191794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: bone contact in vivo in rabbits.
London RM; Roberts FA; Baker DA; Rohrer MD; O'Neal RB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 12074452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Histological evaluation of titanium fiber mesh-coated implants in a rabbit femoral condyle model.
Li J; Ahmed A; Degrande T; De Baerdemaeker J; Al-Rasheed A; van den Beucken JJ; Jansen JA; Alghamdi HS; Walboomers XF
Dent Mater; 2022 Apr; 38(4):613-621. PubMed ID: 34955235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The effect of platelet-rich plasma on the bone healing around calcium phosphate-coated and non-coated oral implants in trabecular bone.
Nikolidakis D; van den Dolder J; Wolke JG; Stoelinga PJ; Jansen JA
Tissue Eng; 2006 Sep; 12(9):2555-63. PubMed ID: 16995788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
