182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23718583)
21. A study of minimum segment width parameter on VMAT plan quality, delivery accuracy, and efficiency for cervical cancer using Monaco TPS.
Wang Y; Chen L; Zhu F; Guo W; Zhang D; Sun W
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):609-615. PubMed ID: 30058257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative analysis of intensity modulation inverse planning modules of three commercial treatment planning systems applied to head and neck tumour model.
Fogliata A; Bolsi A; Cozzi L
Radiother Oncol; 2003 Jan; 66(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 12559518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Statistical process control for IMRT dosimetric verification.
Breen SL; Moseley DJ; Zhang B; Sharpe MB
Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4417-25. PubMed ID: 18975688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Importance of accurate dose calculations outside segment edges in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning.
Schwarz M; Bos LJ; Mijnheer BJ; Lebesque JV; Damen EM
Radiother Oncol; 2003 Dec; 69(3):305-14. PubMed ID: 14644490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A study of quality control method for IMRT planning based on prior knowledge and novel measures derived from both OVHs and DVHs.
Zhou Z; Chen Y; Yu Z; Wang D; Zhao C; Xu J; Song W; Li B; Shen J; Zhu X
Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3479-85. PubMed ID: 25227060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Three-dimensional conformal vs. intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head-and-neck cancer patients: comparative analysis of dosimetric and technical parameters.
Cozzi L; Fogliata A; Bolsi A; Nicolini G; Bernier J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Feb; 58(2):617-24. PubMed ID: 14751535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Is uniform target dose possible in IMRT plans in the head and neck?
Vineberg KA; Eisbruch A; Coselmon MM; McShan DL; Kessler ML; Fraass BA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Apr; 52(5):1159-72. PubMed ID: 11955726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Significant improvement in normal tissue sparing and target coverage for head and neck cancer by means of helical tomotherapy.
Fiorino C; Dell'Oca I; Pierelli A; Broggi S; De Martin E; Di Muzio N; Longobardi B; Fazio F; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 16546279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Independent dosimetric calculation with inclusion of head scatter and MLC transmission for IMRT.
Yang Y; Xing L; Li JG; Palta J; Chen Y; Luxton G; Boyer A
Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2937-47. PubMed ID: 14655941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Predicting dose-volume histograms for organs-at-risk in IMRT planning.
Appenzoller LM; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Mutic S; Moore KL
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7446-61. PubMed ID: 23231294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A feasibility study of using conventional jaws to deliver complex IMRT plans for head and neck cancer.
Mu G; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5613-23. PubMed ID: 19724096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical evaluation of direct aperture optimization when applied to head-and-neck IMRT.
Jones S; Williams M
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18262129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of Elekta VMAT with helical tomotherapy and fixed field IMRT: plan quality, delivery efficiency and accuracy.
Rao M; Yang W; Chen F; Sheng K; Ye J; Mehta V; Shepard D; Cao D
Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1350-9. PubMed ID: 20384272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Dosimetry analysis of intensity-modulated and conformal radiation therapy for head and neck tumors].
Pesznyák C; Béla D; Takácsi-Nagy Z; Major T; Polgár C
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 26035156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dose optimization with first-order total-variation minimization for dense angularly sampled and sparse intensity modulated radiation therapy (DASSIM-RT).
Kim H; Li R; Lee R; Goldstein T; Boyd S; Candes E; Xing L
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4316-27. PubMed ID: 22830765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Feasibility and sensitivity study of helical tomotherapy for dose painting plans.
Deveau MA; Bowen SR; Westerly DC; Jeraj R
Acta Oncol; 2010 Oct; 49(7):991-6. PubMed ID: 20831487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of leaf motion constraints on IMAT plan quality, deliver accuracy, and efficiency.
Chen F; Rao M; Ye JS; Shepard DM; Cao D
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6106-18. PubMed ID: 22047375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of the number of control points has on isodose distributions in a dynamic multileaf collimator intensity-modulated radiation therapy delivery.
Goraj A; de Boer SF
Med Dosim; 2012; 37(4):412-6. PubMed ID: 22572212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of minimum monitor unit threshold on spot scanning proton plan quality.
Howard M; Beltran C; Mayo CS; Herman MG
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091703. PubMed ID: 25186378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
