194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23718614)
1. Silicone breast phantoms for elastographic imaging evaluation.
Kashif AS; Lotz TF; McGarry MD; Pattison AJ; Chase JG
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):063503. PubMed ID: 23718614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel breast software phantom for biomechanical modeling of elastography.
Bhatti SN; Sridhar-Keralapura M
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1748-68. PubMed ID: 22482599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Paraffin-gel tissue-mimicking material for ultrasound-guided needle biopsy phantom.
Vieira SL; Pavan TZ; Junior JE; Carneiro AA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2477-84. PubMed ID: 24035622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of tomosynthesis elastography in a breast-mimicking phantom.
Engelken FJ; Sack I; Klatt D; Fischer T; Fallenberg EM; Bick U; Diekmann F
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2169-73. PubMed ID: 21724357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging.
Xiao Y; Zeng J; Niu L; Zeng Q; Wu T; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 24268454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A New Class of Phantom Materials for Poroelastography Imaging Techniques.
Chaudhry A; Yazdi IK; Kongari R; Tasciotti E; Righetti R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 May; 42(5):1230-8. PubMed ID: 26806439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study of ultrasound stiffness imaging methods using tissue mimicking phantoms.
Manickam K; Machireddy RR; Seshadri S
Ultrasonics; 2014 Feb; 54(2):621-31. PubMed ID: 24083832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of oil-in-gelatin phantoms for viscoelasticity measurement in ultrasound shear wave elastography.
Nguyen MM; Zhou S; Robert JL; Shamdasani V; Xie H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jan; 40(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 24139915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shear-wave elastographic features of breast cancers: comparison with mechanical elasticity and histopathologic characteristics.
Lee SH; Moon WK; Cho N; Chang JM; Moon HG; Han W; Noh DY; Lee JC; Kim HC; Lee KB; Park IA
Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 24169069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anthropomorphic breast phantoms for testing elastography systems.
Madsen EL; Hobson MA; Frank GR; Shi H; Jiang J; Hall TJ; Varghese T; Doyley MM; Weaver JB
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 32(6):857-74. PubMed ID: 16785008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Liver Disease. A Critical Appraisal of the Many Actors on the Stage.
Piscaglia F; Salvatore V; Mulazzani L; Cantisani V; Schiavone C
Ultraschall Med; 2016 Feb; 37(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26871407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Calculation of strain images of a breast-mimicking phantom from 3D CT image data.
Kim JG; Aowlad Hossain AB; Shin JH; Lee SY
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5469-78. PubMed ID: 22957614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Elastography of soft materials and tissues by holographic imaging of surface acoustic waves.
Mohan KD; Oldenburg AL
Opt Express; 2012 Aug; 20(17):18887-97. PubMed ID: 23038528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tissue mimicking materials for the detection of prostate cancer using shear wave elastography: a validation study.
Cao R; Huang Z; Varghese T; Nabi G
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):022903. PubMed ID: 23387774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Building a virtual simulation platform for quasistatic breast ultrasound elastography using open source software: A preliminary investigation.
Wang Y; Helminen E; Jiang J
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5453-66. PubMed ID: 26328994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasonic elastography in breast cancer diagnosis: strain ratio vs 5-point scale.
Zhi H; Xiao XY; Yang HY; Ou B; Wen YL; Luo BM
Acad Radiol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1227-33. PubMed ID: 20650662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ex vivo and in vivo assessment of the non-linearity of elasticity properties of breast tissues for quantitative strain elastography.
Umemoto T; Ueno E; Matsumura T; Yamakawa M; Bando H; Mitake T; Shiina T
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1755-68. PubMed ID: 24802305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of four different techniques to evaluate the elastic properties of phantom in elastography: is there a gold standard?
Oudry J; Lynch T; Vappou J; Sandrin L; Miette V
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 59(19):5775-93. PubMed ID: 25208061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Convertible pneumatic actuator for magnetic resonance elastography of the brain.
Latta P; Gruwel ML; Debergue P; Matwiy B; Sboto-Frankenstein UN; Tomanek B
Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jan; 29(1):147-52. PubMed ID: 20833495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving the homogeneity of tissue-mimicking cryogel phantoms for medical imaging.
Minton JA; Iravani A; Yousefi AM
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6796-807. PubMed ID: 23130805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
