These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23718761)

  • 1. Forensic facial comparison: issues of admissibility in the development of novel analytical technique.
    Mallett X; Evison MP
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(4):859-65. PubMed ID: 23718761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forensic facial comparison in South Africa: State of the science.
    Steyn M; Pretorius M; Briers N; Bacci N; Johnson A; Houlton TMR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jun; 287():190-194. PubMed ID: 29698915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Just truth? Carefully applying history, philosophy and sociology of science to the forensic use of CCTV images.
    Edmond G
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 23036862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of image quality and forensic expertise in facial image comparisons.
    Norell K; Läthén KB; Bergström P; Rice A; Natu V; O'Toole A
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Mar; 60(2):331-40. PubMed ID: 25537273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Poor reliability of facial indices for comparative metric facial identification without parametrical superimposition.
    Introna F; De Donno A; Santoro V; Carbonara M
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2007 Dec; 3(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 25869268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of forensic facial comparison by morphological analysis in photographic and CCTV samples.
    Bacci N; Houlton TMR; Briers N; Steyn M
    Int J Legal Med; 2021 Sep; 135(5):1965-1981. PubMed ID: 33594456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Forensic face recognition as a means to determine strength of evidence: A survey.
    Zeinstra CG; Meuwly D; Ruifrok AC; Veldhuis RN; Spreeuwers LJ
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2018 Jan; 30(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 29273569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification using face regions: application and assessment in forensic scenarios.
    Tome P; Fierrez J; Vera-Rodriguez R; Ramos D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Dec; 233(1-3):75-83. PubMed ID: 24314504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Empirical test of the performance of an acoustic-phonetic approach to forensic voice comparison under conditions similar to those of a real case.
    Enzinger E; Morrison GS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Aug; 277():30-40. PubMed ID: 28575731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forensic Gait Analysis and Recognition: Standards of Evidence Admissibility.
    Macoveciuc I; Rando CJ; Borrion H
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Sep; 64(5):1294-1303. PubMed ID: 30791120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forensic human identification in the United States and Canada: a review of the law, admissible techniques, and the legal implications of their application in forensic cases.
    Holobinko A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Oct; 222(1-3):394.e1-13. PubMed ID: 22738737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The over-citation of Daubert in forensic anthropology.
    Lesciotto KM; Christensen AM
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jan; 69(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 37855082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of some problematic factors in facial image identification using a 2D/3D superimposition technique.
    Atsuchi M; Tsuji A; Usumoto Y; Yoshino M; Ikeda N
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2013 Sep; 15(5):244-8. PubMed ID: 23886899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of forensic facial comparison by morphological analysis across optimal and suboptimal CCTV settings.
    Bacci N; Steyn M; Briers N
    Sci Justice; 2021 Nov; 61(6):743-754. PubMed ID: 34802648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part II--judicial reasoning in decisions to exclude forensic identification evidence on grounds of reliability.
    Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jul; 56(4):913-7. PubMed ID: 21729081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
    Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In search of a free movement of forensic evidence: Towards minimum standards to determine evidence admissibility?
    Depauw S
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2020 Aug; 74():102021. PubMed ID: 32769042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A View to the Future: A Novel Approach for 3D-3D Superimposition and Quantification of Differences for Identification from Next-Generation Video Surveillance Systems.
    Gibelli D; De Angelis D; Poppa P; Sforza C; Cattaneo C
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):457-461. PubMed ID: 27892601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part I--A quantitative analysis of the exclusion of forensic identification science evidence.
    Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1180-4. PubMed ID: 21884119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.