These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23718761)
21. An exploration of sample representativeness in anthropometric facial comparison. Mallett XD; Dryden I; Bruegge RV; Evison M J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jul; 55(4):1025-31. PubMed ID: 20487167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Of earprints, fingerprints, scent dogs, cot deaths and cognitive contamination--a brief look at the present state of play in the forensic arena. Broeders AP Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jun; 159(2-3):148-57. PubMed ID: 16226860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Are facial image analysis experts any better than the general public at identifying individuals from CCTV images? Wilkinson C; Evans R Sci Justice; 2009 Sep; 49(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 19839418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A discussion of current issues and concepts in the practice of skull-photo/craniofacial superimposition. Gordon GM; Steyn M Forensic Sci Int; 2016 May; 262():287.e1-4. PubMed ID: 26970657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Believing doesn't make it so: forensic education and the search for truth. Scott CL J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(1):18-32. PubMed ID: 23503172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The admissibility of offender profiling in courtroom: a review of legal issues and court opinions. Bosco D; Zappalà A; Santtila P Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 20416950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The impact of Daubert on the admissibility of forensic anthropology expert testimony. Lesciotto KM J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):549-55. PubMed ID: 25716577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Use of the computer in dentistry: video superimposition and facial reproduction using the expedience of the computer interface]. Smeets B; De Valck E Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(4):272-83. PubMed ID: 9289758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Recognizability of computer-generated facial approximations in an automated facial recognition context for potential use in unidentified persons data repositories: Optimally and operationally modeled conditions. Parks CL; Monson KL Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():272-278. PubMed ID: 30108019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quality management systems and the admissibility of scientific evidence: the Costa Rican experience. Salas M; Gomez D Bull Narc; 2005; 57(1-2):259-69. PubMed ID: 21338026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ten years after Daubert: the status of the states. Keierleber JA; Bohan TL J Forensic Sci; 2005 Sep; 50(5):1154-63. PubMed ID: 16225224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessing the effect of facial disguises on forensic facial comparison by morphological analysis. Bacci N; Briers N; Steyn M J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1220-1233. PubMed ID: 33885153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Research Progress and Prospect of Facial Reconstruction in Forensic Science]. Zhao JM; Chu G; Mou QN; Han MQ; Chen T; Hou YX; Guo YC Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Oct; 36(5):614-621. PubMed ID: 33295160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]