These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23718896)

  • 1. Two sampling techniques for game meat.
    van der Merwe M; Jooste PJ; Hoffman LC; Calitz FJ
    J S Afr Vet Assoc; 2013 Mar; 84(1):E1-6. PubMed ID: 23718896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microbiological sampling of swine carcasses: a comparison of data obtained by swabbing with medical gauze and data collected routinely by excision at Swedish abattoirs.
    Lindblad M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 118(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 17706823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Excision vs sponge swabbing - a comparison of methods for the microbiological sampling of beef, pork and lamb carcasses.
    Pearce RA; Bolton DJ
    J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 98(4):896-900. PubMed ID: 15752336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental comparison of excision and swabbing microbiological sampling methods for carcasses.
    Pepperell R; Reid CA; Solano SN; Hutchison ML; Walters LD; Johnston AM; Buncic S
    J Food Prot; 2005 Oct; 68(10):2163-8. PubMed ID: 16245724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microbiological sampling of carcasses by excision or swabbing.
    Gill CO; Jones T
    J Food Prot; 2000 Feb; 63(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 10678419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of European standards for health and quality control of game meat on game ranches in South Africa.
    Van der Merwe M; Jooste PJ; Hoffman LC
    J S Afr Vet Assoc; 2011 Sep; 82(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 22332302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Destructive and nondestructive procedures to obtain chicken carcass samples for Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. detection.
    Cossi MV; de Almeida MV; Dias MR; de Arruda Pinto PS; Nero LA
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2011 Dec; 8(12):1303-7. PubMed ID: 21854266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A survey of the microbiological quality of feral pig carcasses processed for human consumption in Queensland, Australia.
    Eglezos S; Stuttard E; Huang B; Dykes GA; Fegan N
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2008 Feb; 5(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 18260821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microbial contamination on beef in relation to hygiene assessment based on criteria used in EU Decision 2001/471/EC.
    McEvoy JM; Sheridan JJ; Blair IS; McDowell DA
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 92(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 15109799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microbiological carcass sampling methods to achieve compliance with 2001/471/EC and new hygiene regulations.
    Byrne B; Dunne G; Lyng J; Bolton DJ
    Res Microbiol; 2005; 156(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 15636754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proximate sources of bacteria on boneless loins prepared from routinely processed and detained carcasses at a pork packing plant.
    Gill CO; Landers C
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Dec; 97(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 15541803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microbiological sampling of meat cuts and manufacturing beef by excision or swabbing.
    Gill CO; Badoni M; McGinnis JC
    J Food Prot; 2001 Mar; 64(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 11252475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of swab and maceration methods for bacterial sampling of pig carcasses.
    Morgan IR; Krautil F; Craven JA
    J Hyg (Lond); 1985 Oct; 95(2):383-90. PubMed ID: 3905957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhanced control of microbiological contamination of product at a large beef packing plant.
    Yang X; Badoni M; Youssef MK; Gill CO
    J Food Prot; 2012 Jan; 75(1):144-9. PubMed ID: 22221368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The hygiene practices of three systems of game meat production in South Africa in terms of animal class and health compliance.
    Van der Merwe M; Hoffman LC; Jooste PJ; Calitz FJ
    Meat Sci; 2013 May; 94(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 23416626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects on the microbiological condition of product of carcass dressing, cooling, and portioning processes at a poultry packing plant.
    Gill CO; Moza LF; Badoni M; Barbut S
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 110(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 16793158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of wet-dry swabbing and excision sampling methods for microbiological testing of bovine, porcine, and ovine carcasses at red meat slaughterhouses.
    Hutchison ML; Walters LD; Avery SM; Reid CA; Wilson D; Howell M; Johnston AM; Buncic S
    J Food Prot; 2005 Oct; 68(10):2155-62. PubMed ID: 16245723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic relatedness of Escherichia coli O157 isolates from cattle feces and preintervention beef carcasses.
    Dodd CC; Renter DG; Fox JT; Shi X; Sanderson MW; Nagaraja TG
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2010 Apr; 7(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 19911900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microbial profiles of carcasses and minced meat from kangaroos processed in South Australia.
    Holds G; Pointon A; Lorimer M; Kiermeier A; Raven G; Sumner J
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Mar; 123(1-2):88-92. PubMed ID: 18234385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationships between the density of different indicator organisms on sheep and beef carcasses and in frozen beef and sheep meat.
    Jordan D; Phillips D; Sumner J; Morris S; Jenson I
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Jan; 102(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 17184320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.