These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23718896)

  • 21. Comparison between carcass microbial load recovered by swabbing surfaces of different size and using the reference excision method.
    Miraglia D; Ranucci D; D'Ovidio V; Branciari R; Severini M
    Vet Res Commun; 2005 Aug; 29 Suppl 2():339-41. PubMed ID: 16244989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prevalence of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli from serotype O157 and other attaching and effacing Escherichia coli on bovine carcasses in Algeria.
    Chahed A; China B; Mainil J; Daube G
    J Appl Microbiol; 2006 Aug; 101(2):361-8. PubMed ID: 16882143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Farm-to-fork characterization of Escherichia coli associated with feedlot cattle with a known history of antimicrobial use.
    Alexander TW; Inglis GD; Yanke LJ; Topp E; Read RR; Reuter T; McAllister TA
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 137(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 19963297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Enumeration of Salmonella and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef, cattle carcass, hide and faecal samples using direct plating methods.
    Brichta-Harhay DM; Arthur TM; Bosilevac JM; Guerini MN; Kalchayanand N; Koohmaraie M
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Nov; 103(5):1657-68. PubMed ID: 17953577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the SimPlate method for enumeration of Escherichia coli in swab samples from beef and lamb carcasses.
    Hauge SJ; Nesbakken T; Skjerve E; Dommarsnes K; Østensvik Ø
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2010 Aug; 142(1-2):229-33. PubMed ID: 20659776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Microbiologic evaluation of carcasses before and after washing in a beef slaughter plant.
    Jericho KW; Bradley JA; Kozub GC
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1995 Feb; 206(4):452-5. PubMed ID: 7632246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of destructive and nondestructive sampling techniques of retail chicken carcasses for enumeration of hygiene indicator microorganisms.
    Cossi MV; de Almeida MV; Dias MR; de Arruda Pinto PS; Nero LA
    J Food Prot; 2012 Jan; 75(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 22221352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The bacterial quality of red meat and offal in Casablanca (Morocco).
    Cohen N; Ennaji H; Hassar M; Karib H
    Mol Nutr Food Res; 2006 May; 50(6):557-62. PubMed ID: 16676376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157 and verocytotoxin producing E. coli (VTEC) on Danish beef carcasses.
    Breum SØ; Boel J
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2010 Jun; 141(1-2):90-6. PubMed ID: 20427097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prevalence of tetracycline resistance and genotypic analysis of populations of Escherichia coli from animals, carcasses and cuts processed at a pig slaughterhouse.
    Wu S; Dalsgaard A; Vieira AR; Emborg HD; Jensen LB
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2009 Nov; 135(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 19717199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sampling methods for microbiological analysis of red meat and poultry carcasses.
    Capita R; Prieto M; Alonso-Calleja C
    J Food Prot; 2004 Jun; 67(6):1303-8. PubMed ID: 15222570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of Escherichia coli levels at four sampling sites on turkey carcasses.
    Bodnaruk PW; Schmelder JL; Krakar PJ; Tompkin RB
    Poult Sci; 1998 Oct; 77(10):1531-3. PubMed ID: 9776061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of six sampling methods for recovery of bacteria from beef carcass surfaces.
    Dorsa WJ; Cutter CN; Siragusa GR
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 1996 Jan; 22(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 8588886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Total rinse method for microbiological sampling of the internal cavity of eviscerated broiler carcasses.
    Blankenship LC; Cox NA; Craven SE; Richardson RL
    Appl Microbiol; 1975 Aug; 30(2):290-2. PubMed ID: 1099989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of microbial counts on beef carcasses by using the moist-swab contact method and secondary tissue removal technique.
    Lazarus CR; Abu-Bakar A; West RL; Oblinger JL
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1977 Jan; 33(1):217-8. PubMed ID: 319755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A new simple method for microbiological sampling of meat surfaces.
    Goulet J; Lévesque G; Moreau JR; Roth LA
    Can J Microbiol; 1983 Jun; 29(6):631-6. PubMed ID: 6883223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Method for sampling meat surfaces.
    Yokoya F; Zulzke ML
    Appl Microbiol; 1975 Apr; 29(4):551-2. PubMed ID: 1168443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bacterial sampling techniques on beef, pork, and lamb adipose tissue.
    Berry BW; Joseph AL; Chen AA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1978 May; 35(5):978-9. PubMed ID: 350160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of Swab and Tissue Excision Methods for Recovering Microorganisms from Washed and Sanitized Beef Carcasses
    Anderson ME; Huff HE; Naumann HD; Marshall RT; Damare J; Johnston R; Pratt M
    J Food Prot; 1987 Sep; 50(9):741-743. PubMed ID: 30978795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of Three Carcass Surface Microbial Sampling Techniques.
    Nortje GL; Swanepoel E; Naude RT; Holzapfel WH; Steyn PL
    J Food Prot; 1982 Sep; 45(11):1016-1017. PubMed ID: 30913623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.