These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23718946)

  • 21. Sociosexuality predicts women's preferences for symmetry in men's faces.
    Quist MC; Watkins CD; Smith FG; Little AC; Debruine LM; Jones BC
    Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Dec; 41(6):1415-21. PubMed ID: 21882053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Urban teens and young adults describe drama, disrespect, dating violence and help-seeking preferences.
    Martin CE; Houston AM; Mmari KN; Decker MR
    Matern Child Health J; 2012 Jul; 16(5):957-66. PubMed ID: 21611717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sex and age differences in mate-selection preferences.
    Schwarz S; Hassebrauck M
    Hum Nat; 2012 Dec; 23(4):447-66. PubMed ID: 22941269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Experimental Evidence for Sex Differences in Sexual Variety Preferences: Support for the Coolidge Effect in Humans.
    Hughes SM; Aung T; Harrison MA; LaFayette JN; Gallup GG
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Feb; 50(2):495-509. PubMed ID: 32440927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Women's Mating Strategies and Mate Value Are Associated with Viewing Time to Facial Masculinity.
    Garza R; Byrd-Craven J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2023 Jul; 52(5):2143-2151. PubMed ID: 37245165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Good mates retain us right: investigating the relationship between mate retention strategies, mate value, and relationship satisfaction.
    Salkicevic S; Stanic AL; Grabovac MT
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Dec; 12(5):1038-52. PubMed ID: 25481238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mate Preferences for Warmth-Trustworthiness Predict Romantic Attraction in the Early Stages of Mate Selection and Satisfaction in Ongoing Relationships.
    Valentine KA; Li NP; Meltzer AL; Tsai MH
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2020 Feb; 46(2):298-311. PubMed ID: 31184259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Same-sex gaze attraction influences mate-choice copying in humans.
    Yorzinski JL; Platt ML
    PLoS One; 2010 Feb; 5(2):e9115. PubMed ID: 20161739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: cross-cultural variation in women's preferences for masculinized male faces.
    DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Crawford JR; Welling LL; Little AC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Aug; 277(1692):2405-10. PubMed ID: 20236978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dating, marital, and hypothetical extradyadic involvements: how do they compare?
    Allen ES; Baucom DH
    J Sex Res; 2006 Nov; 43(4):307-17. PubMed ID: 17599252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sex differences in short-term mate preferences and behavioral mimicry: a semi-naturalistic experiment.
    van Straaten I; Engels RC; Finkenauer C; Holland RW
    Arch Sex Behav; 2008 Dec; 37(6):902-11. PubMed ID: 17682936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Conditional expression of women's desires and men's mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle.
    Haselton MG; Gangestad SW
    Horm Behav; 2006 Apr; 49(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 16403409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Making meaning of relationships: young women's experiences and understandings of dating violence.
    Chung D
    Violence Against Women; 2007 Dec; 13(12):1274-95. PubMed ID: 17971578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. People overestimate their willingness to reject potential romantic partners by overlooking their concern for other people.
    Joel S; Teper R; MacDonald G
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Dec; 25(12):2233-40. PubMed ID: 25344347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The long and short of mistress relationships: Sex-differentiated mate preferences reflect a compromise of mating ideals.
    Choy BKC; Li NP; Tan K
    J Pers; 2023 Apr; 91(2):383-399. PubMed ID: 35567542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predictive validity and adjustment of ideal partner preferences across the transition into romantic relationships.
    Gerlach TM; Arslan RC; Schultze T; Reinhard SK; Penke L
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Feb; 116(2):313-330. PubMed ID: 28921999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. What Do Women Want? A Qualitative Study of Dating.
    Noel NE; Ogle RL; Maisto SA; Jackson LA
    Violence Against Women; 2016 Feb; 22(2):168-88. PubMed ID: 25331154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Male Partners' Investment and Alternatives as Correlates of Women's Coerced First Sexual Intercourse in Chinese Dating Relationships: A Social Exchange Perspective.
    He S; Tsang S
    J Interpers Violence; 2019 Jan; 34(1):182-199. PubMed ID: 29294617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Altruism as an indicator of good parenting quality in long-term relationships: further investigations using the Mate Preferences Towards Altruistic Traits Scale.
    Farrelly D
    J Soc Psychol; 2013; 153(4):395-8. PubMed ID: 23951948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.
    Li NP; Yong JC; Tov W; Sng O; Fletcher GJ; Valentine KA; Jiang YF; Balliet D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):757-76. PubMed ID: 23915041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.