These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23718946)

  • 41. Effects of attractiveness and social status on dating desire in heterosexual adolescents: an experimental study.
    Ha T; Overbeek G; Engels RC
    Arch Sex Behav; 2010 Oct; 39(5):1063-71. PubMed ID: 19830538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Women's use of intimate apparel as subtle sexual signals in committed, heterosexual relationships.
    Craig LK; Gray PB
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0230112. PubMed ID: 32168340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Men's strategic preferences for femininity in female faces.
    Little AC; Jones BC; Feinberg DR; Perrett DI
    Br J Psychol; 2014 Aug; 105(3):364-81. PubMed ID: 25040006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Ovulatory shifts in women's attractions to primary partners and other men: further evidence of the importance of primary partner sexual attractiveness.
    Larson CM; Pillsworth EG; Haselton MG
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e44456. PubMed ID: 22984512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Women's perceptions of sexual exploitability cues and their link to sexual attractiveness.
    Goetz CD; Easton JA; Buss DM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Jul; 43(5):999-1008. PubMed ID: 24217951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Homosexual mating preferences from an evolutionary perspective: sexual selection theory revisited.
    Gobrogge KL; Perkins PS; Baker JH; Balcer KD; Breedlove SM; Klump KL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Oct; 36(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 17674179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Correlated male preferences for femininity in female faces and voices.
    Fraccaro PJ; Feinberg DR; DeBruine LM; Little AC; Watkins CD; Jones BC
    Evol Psychol; 2010 Aug; 8(3):447-61. PubMed ID: 22947812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Euclidean Mate Value and Power of Choice on the Mating Market.
    Conroy-Beam D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2018 Feb; 44(2):252-264. PubMed ID: 29082804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Chinese undergraduates' preferences for altruistic traits in mate selection and personal advertisement: Evidence from Q-sort technique.
    Guo Q; Feng L; Wang M
    Int J Psychol; 2017 Apr; 52(2):145-153. PubMed ID: 26334113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Women's Experiences With Feelings and Attractions for Someone Outside their Primary Relationship.
    Mullinax M; Barnhart KJ; Mark K; Herbenick D
    J Sex Marital Ther; 2016 Jul; 42(5):431-47. PubMed ID: 26182078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Blind dates and mate preferences: an analysis of newspaper matchmaking columns.
    Kelley JM; Malouf RA
    Evol Psychol; 2013 Jan; 11(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 23282582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology.
    Clarkson TR; Sidari MJ; Sains R; Alexander M; Harrison M; Mefodeva V; Pearson S; Lee AJ; Dixson BJW
    R Soc Open Sci; 2020 Jan; 7(1):191209. PubMed ID: 32218951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Do women's mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review.
    Gildersleeve K; Haselton MG; Fales MR
    Psychol Bull; 2014 Sep; 140(5):1205-59. PubMed ID: 24564172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Oral contraceptive use in women changes preferences for male facial masculinity and is associated with partner facial masculinity.
    Little AC; Burriss RP; Petrie M; Jones BC; Roberts SC
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2013 Sep; 38(9):1777-85. PubMed ID: 23528282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assessment of Long-Term Mate Preferences in Iran.
    Atari M
    Evol Psychol; 2017; 15(2):1474704917702459. PubMed ID: 28401792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Relationship dealbreakers: traits people avoid in potential mates.
    Jonason PK; Garcia JR; Webster GD; Li NP; Fisher HE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Dec; 41(12):1697-711. PubMed ID: 26445853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Individual differences in mate poaching: an examination of hormonal, dispositional, and behavioral mate-value traits.
    Sunderani S; Arnocky S; Vaillancourt T
    Arch Sex Behav; 2013 May; 42(4):533-42. PubMed ID: 22695642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Are Sex Differences in Preferences for Physical Attractiveness and Good Earning Capacity in Potential Mates Smaller in Countries With Greater Gender Equality?
    Zhang L; Lee AJ; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    Evol Psychol; 2019; 17(2):1474704919852921. PubMed ID: 31146580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Mating Strategies and the Masculinity Paradox: How Relationship Context, Relationship Status, and Sociosexuality Shape Women's Preferences for Facial Masculinity and Beardedness.
    Stower RE; Lee AJ; McIntosh TL; Sidari MJ; Sherlock JM; Dixson BJW
    Arch Sex Behav; 2020 Apr; 49(3):809-820. PubMed ID: 31016490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Infidelity in Dating Relationships: Gender-Specific Correlates of Face-to-Face and Online Extradyadic Involvement.
    Martins A; Pereira M; Andrade R; Dattilio FM; Narciso I; Canavarro MC
    Arch Sex Behav; 2016 Jan; 45(1):193-205. PubMed ID: 26194971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.