164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23719016)
1. Clinical comparison of Fuji VII and a resin sealant in children at high and low risk of caries.
Chen Xx; Liu Xg
Dent Mater J; 2013; 32(3):512-8. PubMed ID: 23719016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Caries-preventive efficacy and retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant: a 3-year split-mouth randomised clinical trial.
Baseggio W; Naufel FS; Davidoff DC; Nahsan FP; Flury S; Rodrigues JA
Oral Health Prev Dent; 2010; 8(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 20848004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of FUJI VII sealant material.
Ganesh M; Tandon S
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 31(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 17091660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retention of a resin-based sealant and a glass ionomer used as a fissure sealant: a comparative clinical study.
Subramaniam P; Konde S; Mandanna DK
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2008 Sep; 26(3):114-20. PubMed ID: 18923223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fissure sealants: a 4-year clinical trial comparing an experimental glass polyalkenoate cement with a bis glycidyl methacrylate resin used as fissure sealants.
Williams B; Laxton L; Holt RD; Winter GB
Br Dent J; 1996 Feb; 180(3):104-8. PubMed ID: 8746143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Twenty-four month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants on partially erupted permanent first molars: glass ionomer versus resin-based sealant.
Antonson SA; Antonson DE; Brener S; Crutchfield J; Larumbe J; Michaud C; Yazici AR; Hardigan PC; Alempour S; Evans D; Ocanto R
J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Feb; 143(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 22298552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A two-year clinical evaluation of glass ionomer and ormocer based fissure sealants.
Guler C; Yilmaz Y
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013; 37(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 23855170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Caries prevention effectiveness of aresin based sealant and a glass ionomer sealants: a report of 5-year-follow-up].
Liu YJ; Chang Q; Rong WS; Zhao XL
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 53(7):437-442. PubMed ID: 29996359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of glass-ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a 2-year clinical trial.
Forss H; Saarni UM; Seppä L
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1994 Feb; 22(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 8143437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical performance of a glass ionomer sealant protected with two different resin-based agents over a 2-year follow-up period.
Ulusoy AT; Tunc ES; Bayrak Ş
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2017 Mar; 18(1):10-14. PubMed ID: 28494595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of retention and the effect on caries of fissure sealing with a glass-ionomer and a resin-based sealant.
Poulsen S; Beiruti N; Sadat N
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2001 Aug; 29(4):298-301. PubMed ID: 11515644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retention of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant and effect on carious outcome after 7 years.
Forss H; Halme E
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Feb; 26(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9511837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retention and caries preventive effects of a GIC and a resin-based fissure sealant.
Arrow P; Riordan PJ
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1995 Oct; 23(5):282-5. PubMed ID: 8529341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fuji III vs. Fuji VII glass ionomer sealants--a clinical study.
Kamala BK; Hegde AM
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2008; 33(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 19093648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A field trial of resin-based and glass-ionomer fissure sealants: clinical and radiographic assessment of caries.
Poulsen S; Laurberg L; Vaeth M; Jensen U; Haubek D
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2006 Feb; 34(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 16423029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retention rates and caries-preventive effects of two different sealant materials: a randomised clinical trial.
Cabral RN; Faber J; Otero SAM; Hilgert LA; Leal SC
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec; 22(9):3171-3177. PubMed ID: 29524027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative evaluation of the marginal sealing ability of Fuji VII and Concise as pit and fissure sealants.
Ganesh M; Shobha T
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 May; 8(4):10-8. PubMed ID: 17486182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retention of fissure sealants in young permanent molars affected by dental fluorosis: a 12-month clinical study.
Hasanuddin S; Reddy ER; Manjula M; Srilaxmi N; Rani ST; Rajesh A
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2014 Oct; 15(5):309-15. PubMed ID: 24737141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Caries-Preventive Effect and Retention of Glass-Ionomer and Resin-Based Sealants: A Randomized Clinical Comparative Evaluation.
Uzel I; Gurlek C; Kuter B; Ertugrul F; Eden E
Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():7205692. PubMed ID: 35769675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retention and caries-preventive effect of glass ionomer and resin-based sealants: An 18-month-randomized clinical trial.
Al-Jobair A; Al-Hammad N; Alsadhan S; Salama F
Dent Mater J; 2017 Sep; 36(5):654-661. PubMed ID: 28701637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
