These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23719438)

  • 1. Fallout from hailed cloning paper.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2013 May; 497(7451):543-4. PubMed ID: 23719438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The trouble with replication.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7101):344-7. PubMed ID: 16871184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Korean scandal will have global fallout.
    Check E; Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7071):1056-7. PubMed ID: 16371963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bad peer reviewers.
    Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):93. PubMed ID: 11557930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On cloning research, peer review and the possibility of fraud.
    Carrió I
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Mar; 33(3):235-6. PubMed ID: 16477432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scientific misconduct, stem cells, and the way ahead.
    Lindblad WJ
    Wound Repair Regen; 2006; 14(2):101. PubMed ID: 16630096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scientific misconduct.
    Sundaram M; Rosenthal DI; Hodler J
    Skeletal Radiol; 2007 Mar; 36(3):179. PubMed ID: 17205322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative].
    Werkö L
    Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Should journals police scientific fraud?
    Marris E
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):520-1. PubMed ID: 16452946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Industry money skews drug overviews.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2005 Sep; 437(7058):458-9. PubMed ID: 16177748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomedicine. Review of cloning paper prompts questions.
    Couzin-Frankel J; Vogel G
    Science; 2013 May; 340(6136):1026-7. PubMed ID: 23723209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peering into peer review: Galileo, ESP, Dr Scott Reuben, and advancing our professional evolution.
    Biddle C
    AANA J; 2011 Oct; 79(5):365-6. PubMed ID: 23256263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Replicator review.
    Nature; 2007 Nov; 450(7169):457-8. PubMed ID: 18033253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Journals: redundant publications are bad news.
    Mojon-Azzi SM; Jiang X; Wagner U; Mojon DS
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209. PubMed ID: 12529610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retractions' realities.
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
    Adam D; Knight J
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The petty crimes perpetuated by academia: scientific literature's death by a thousand cuts.
    Slade E; Tamber PS
    Menopause Int; 2007 Sep; 13(3):95-7. PubMed ID: 17785034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Doctor admits Lancet study is fiction.
    Marris E
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):248-9. PubMed ID: 16421528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases].
    Pontille D; Torny D
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Aug; 60(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 22819062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of impact factors.
    Hemmingsson A; Edgren J; Mygind T; Skjennald A
    Lancet; 2002 Jan; 359(9301):173. PubMed ID: 11809301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.