473 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23719760)
1. Fluid-structure interaction modeling of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the impact of patient-specific inflow conditions and fluid/solid coupling.
Chandra S; Raut SS; Jana A; Biederman RW; Doyle M; Muluk SC; Finol EA
J Biomech Eng; 2013 Aug; 135(8):81001. PubMed ID: 23719760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Low wall shear stress predominates at sites of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture.
Boyd AJ; Kuhn DC; Lozowy RJ; Kulbisky GP
J Vasc Surg; 2016 Jun; 63(6):1613-9. PubMed ID: 25752691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms: effects of asymmetry and wall thickness.
Scotti CM; Shkolnik AD; Muluk SC; Finol EA
Biomed Eng Online; 2005 Nov; 4():64. PubMed ID: 16271141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fluid structure interaction of patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysms: a comparison with solid stress models.
Leung JH; Wright AR; Cheshire N; Crane J; Thom SA; Hughes AD; Xu Y
Biomed Eng Online; 2006 May; 5():33. PubMed ID: 16712729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The importance of patient-specific regionally varying wall thickness in abdominal aortic aneurysm biomechanics.
Raut SS; Jana A; De Oliveira V; Muluk SC; Finol EA
J Biomech Eng; 2013 Aug; 135(8):81010. PubMed ID: 23722475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Progression of abdominal aortic aneurysm towards rupture: refining clinical risk assessment using a fully coupled fluid-structure interaction method.
Xenos M; Labropoulos N; Rambhia S; Alemu Y; Einav S; Tassiopoulos A; Sakalihasan N; Bluestein D
Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Jan; 43(1):139-53. PubMed ID: 25527320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility of deriving parameters of AAA rupture risk from patient-specific 3D finite element models.
Hyhlik-Dürr A; Krieger T; Geisbüsch P; Kotelis D; Able T; Böckler D
J Endovasc Ther; 2011 Jun; 18(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 21679063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of angulation in abdominal aortic aneurysms: fluid-structure interaction simulations of idealized geometries.
Xenos M; Alemu Y; Zamfir D; Einav S; Ricotta JJ; Labropoulos N; Tassiopoulos A; Bluestein D
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2010 Dec; 48(12):1175-90. PubMed ID: 21088917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of regional mechanical properties of abdominal aortic aneurysms to advance finite element modeling of rupture risk.
Tierney ÁP; Callanan A; McGloughlin TM
J Endovasc Ther; 2012 Feb; 19(1):100-14. PubMed ID: 22313210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Peak Wall Stress in an Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Using FSI Simulations: Effects of Aortic Stiffness and Peripheral Resistance.
Campobasso R; Condemi F; Viallon M; Croisille P; Campisi S; Avril S
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):707-722. PubMed ID: 30341731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical Indices for Rupture Risk Estimation in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.
Leemans EL; Willems TP; van der Laan MJ; Slump CH; Zeebregts CJ
J Endovasc Ther; 2017 Apr; 24(2):254-261. PubMed ID: 27872318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation of Intraluminal Thrombus Deposition, Biomechanics, and Hemodynamics with Surface Growth and Rupture in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm-Application in a Clinical Paradigm.
Metaxa E; Tzirakis K; Kontopodis N; Ioannou CV; Papaharilaou Y
Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Jan; 46():357-366. PubMed ID: 28887252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 3D Modeling of Blood Flow in Simulated Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.
Gonzalez-Urquijo M; de Zamacona RG; Mendoza AKM; Iribarren MZ; Ibarra EG; Bencomo MDM; Fabiani MA
Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2021 Oct; 55(7):677-683. PubMed ID: 33902355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finite element analysis in symptomatic and asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms for aortic disease risk stratification.
Soto B; Vila L; Dilmé J; Escudero JR; Bellmunt S; Camacho M
Int Angiol; 2018 Dec; 37(6):479-485. PubMed ID: 30203637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of model assumptions on results of computational mechanics in abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Reeps C; Gee M; Maier A; Gurdan M; Eckstein HH; Wall WA
J Vasc Surg; 2010 Mar; 51(3):679-88. PubMed ID: 20206812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aortic outflow occlusion predicts rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Crawford JD; Chivukula VK; Haller S; Vatankhah N; Bohannan CJ; Moneta GL; Rugonyi S; Azarbal AF
J Vasc Surg; 2016 Dec; 64(6):1623-1628. PubMed ID: 27374068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diameter-related variations of geometrical, mechanical, and mass fraction data in the anterior portion of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Tong J; Cohnert T; Holzapfel GA
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2015 Mar; 49(3):262-70. PubMed ID: 25617258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel strategy to translate the biomechanical rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms to their equivalent diameter risk: method and retrospective validation.
Gasser TC; Nchimi A; Swedenborg J; Roy J; Sakalihasan N; Böckler D; Hyhlik-Dürr A
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2014 Mar; 47(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 24456739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wall stress and flow dynamics in abdominal aortic aneurysms: finite element analysis vs. fluid-structure interaction.
Scotti CM; Jimenez J; Muluk SC; Finol EA
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2008 Jun; 11(3):301-22. PubMed ID: 18568827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finite element analysis in asymptomatic, symptomatic, and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: in search of new rupture risk predictors.
Erhart P; Hyhlik-Dürr A; Geisbüsch P; Kotelis D; Müller-Eschner M; Gasser TC; von Tengg-Kobligk H; Böckler D
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2015 Mar; 49(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 25542592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
