BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23720314)

  • 41. [Impact factor and h index of Spanish biomedical journals].
    García-Pachón E; Padilla-Navas I
    Med Clin (Barc); 2014 Mar; 142(5):226-7. PubMed ID: 24210975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. In scientific publishing at the article level, effort matters more than journal impact factors: hard work and co-authors overshadow journal venue in acquiring citations.
    Winker K
    Bioessays; 2011 Jun; 33(6):400-2. PubMed ID: 21538415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Research evaluation and competition for academic positions in occupational medicine.
    Franco G
    Arch Environ Occup Health; 2013; 68(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 23428063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [A scientometric view of Revista Médica de Chile].
    Krauskopf M; Krauskopf E
    Rev Med Chil; 2008 Aug; 136(8):1065-72. PubMed ID: 18949193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Measuring Scientific Impact With the h-Index: A Primer for Pathologists.
    Schreiber WE; Giustini DM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2019 Feb; 151(3):286-291. PubMed ID: 30346467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Research incentive program for clinical surgical faculty associated with increases in research productivity.
    Schroen AT; Thielen MJ; Turrentine FE; Kron IL; Slingluff CL
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1003-9. PubMed ID: 22929223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitides: a scientometric approach visualizing worldwide research activity.
    Gerber A; Klingelhoefer D; Groneberg D; Bundschuh M
    Int J Rheum Dis; 2014 Sep; 17(7):796-804. PubMed ID: 24702861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. How does the journal impact factor affect the CV of PhD students?
    Sanchis-Gomar F
    EMBO Rep; 2014 Mar; 15(3):207. PubMed ID: 24473241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Measuring researcher independence using bibliometric data: A proposal for a new performance indicator.
    van den Besselaar P; Sandström U
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0202712. PubMed ID: 30917110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Why are there few publications by the Argentine gastroenterology? Considerations on a bibliometric analysis of Argentine publications on gastroenterology].
    Barreyro FJ; Krabshuis J; Planzer del Campo M; Bai JC
    Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2009 Mar; 39(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 19408733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Part II: Should the h-index be modified? An analysis of the m-quotient, contemporary h-index, authorship value, and impact factor.
    Khan NR; Thompson CJ; Taylor DR; Gabrick KS; Choudhri AF; Boop FR; Klimo P
    World Neurosurg; 2013 Dec; 80(6):766-74. PubMed ID: 23886815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Brazilian scientific production in the 40 psychiatric journals with high impact factor in 2006].
    Rocha FF; Fuscaldi T; Castro V; Carmo Wd; Amaral D; Correa H
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2007; 53(6):543-6. PubMed ID: 18157372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Tendencies on Traditional Metrics.
    Ion D; Andronic O; Bolocan A; Al-Moushaly R; Păduraru DN
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2017; 112(2):117-123. PubMed ID: 28463679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Use of Bibliometric Analysis to Assess the Scientific Productivity and Impact of the Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System Program, 2006-2012.
    Reaves EJ; Valle R; Chandrasekera RM; Soto G; Burke RL; Cummings JF; Bausch DG; Kasper MR
    Mil Med; 2017 May; 182(5):e1749-e1756. PubMed ID: 29087920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Bibliometric analysis of six nursing journals from the Web of Science, 2012-2017.
    Giménez-Espert MDC; Prado-Gascó VJ
    J Adv Nurs; 2019 Mar; 75(3):543-554. PubMed ID: 30289557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Honorary authorship epidemic in scholarly publications? How the current use of citation-based evaluative metrics make (pseudo)honorary authors from honest contributors of every multi-author article.
    Kovacs J
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):509-12. PubMed ID: 22865926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Occupational therapy publications by Australian authors: A bibliometric analysis.
    Brown T; Gutman SA; Ho YS
    Aust Occup Ther J; 2018 Aug; 65(4):249-258. PubMed ID: 29344965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. H-index and impact factors: assessing the clinical impact of researchers and specialist journals.
    Sebire NJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 32(7):843-5. PubMed ID: 19035541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The journal impact factor: too much of an impact?
    Ha TC; Tan SB; Soo KC
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2006 Dec; 35(12):911-6. PubMed ID: 17219007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Co-authorship and scientific collaboration networks in Medwave.
    Corrales-Reyes IE
    Medwave; 2017 Dec; 17(9):e7103. PubMed ID: 29244785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.