These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23720588)

  • 1. Perforation of fragment simulating projectiles into goat skin and muscle.
    Breeze J; James GR; Hepper AE
    J R Army Med Corps; 2013 Jun; 159(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 23720588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental penetration of fragment simulating projectiles into porcine tissues compared with simulants.
    Breeze J; Hunt N; Gibb I; James G; Hepper A; Clasper J
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 May; 20(4):296-9. PubMed ID: 23622477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determining the velocity required for skin perforation by fragment simulating projectiles: a systematic review.
    Breeze J; Clasper JC
    J R Army Med Corps; 2013 Dec; 159(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 24109095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Equations for depth of penetration of projectiles.
    Hutchinson TP
    J R Army Med Corps; 2014 Sep; 160(3):261. PubMed ID: 24939605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Refrigeration and freezing of porcine tissue does not affect the retardation of fragment simulating projectiles.
    Breeze J; Carr DJ; Mabbott A; Beckett S; Clasper JC
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2015 May; 32():77-83. PubMed ID: 25882156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The challenges in developing a finite element injury model of the neck to predict the penetration of explosively propelled projectiles.
    Breeze J; Newbery T; Pope D; Midwinter MJ
    J R Army Med Corps; 2014 Sep; 160(3):220-5. PubMed ID: 24109106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computed tomography can improve the selection of fragment simulating projectiles from which to test future body armor materials.
    Breeze J; Leason J; Gibb I; Hunt NC; Hepper A; Clasper J
    Mil Med; 2013 Jun; 178(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 23756078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Penetration of Energized Metal Fragments to Porcine Thoracic Tissues.
    Nguyen TN; Breeze J; Masouros SD
    J Biomech Eng; 2022 Jul; 144(7):. PubMed ID: 34897379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of ageing on the calibration of ballistic gelatin.
    Guey J; Rodrigues S; Pullen A; Shaw B; Kieser DC
    J R Army Med Corps; 2018 Aug; 164(4):277-280. PubMed ID: 29487205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ballistic gelatin calibration standardisation.
    Pullen A; Kieser DC; Hooper G
    BMJ Mil Health; 2022 Apr; 168(2):124-127. PubMed ID: 32169950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ballistic skin simulant.
    Jussila J; Leppäniemi A; Paronen M; Kulomäki E
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 May; 150(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 15837009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterisation of explosive fragments injuring the neck.
    Breeze J; Leason J; Gibb I; Allanson-Bailey L; Hunt N; Hepper A; Spencer P; Clasper J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):e263-6. PubMed ID: 24012051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Projectile penetration into ballistic gelatin.
    Swain MV; Kieser DC; Shah S; Kieser JA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Jan; 29():385-92. PubMed ID: 24184862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of Roebuck 1518 synthetic chamois as a skin simulant when backed by 10% gelatin.
    Pullen A; Kieser DC; Hooper G
    Int J Legal Med; 2021 May; 135(3):909-912. PubMed ID: 32845356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Small fragment wounds: biophysics and pathophysiology.
    Bowyer GW; Cooper GJ; Rice P
    J Trauma; 1996 Mar; 40(3 Suppl):S159-64. PubMed ID: 8606400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental model for civilian ballistic brain injury biomechanics quantification.
    Zhang J; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA; Guan Y; Gennarelli TA
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(10):2341-6. PubMed ID: 17166502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determining the wounding effects of ballistic projectiles to inform future injury models: a systematic review.
    Breeze J; Sedman AJ; James GR; Newbery TW; Hepper AE
    J R Army Med Corps; 2014 Dec; 160(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 24109099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A reconsideration of the wounding mechanism of very high velocity projectiles--importance of projectile shape.
    Fackler ML; Bellamy RF; Malinowski JA
    J Trauma; 1988 Jan; 28(1 Suppl):S63-7. PubMed ID: 3339702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigation of dynamic responses of skin simulant against fragment impact through experiments and concurrent computational modeling.
    Pandey PK; Ganpule SG
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2024; 12():1422685. PubMed ID: 39257446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gelatine Backing Affects the Performance of Single-Layer Ballistic-Resistant Materials Against Blast Fragments.
    Nguyen TN; Meek G; Breeze J; Masouros SD
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2020; 8():744. PubMed ID: 32714916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.