These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23720978)
1. The comparative study of reliability and reproducibility of distal radius' fracture classification among: AO frykman and Fernandez classification systems. Siripakarn Y; Niempoog S; Boontanapibul K J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 Jan; 96(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 23720978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the reliability of classification systems used for distal radius fractures. Kural C; Sungur I; Kaya I; Ugras A; Ertürk A; Cetinus E Orthopedics; 2010 Nov; 33(11):801. PubMed ID: 21053882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A retrospective evaluation of reliability and reproducibility of Arbeitsgemeinschaftfür Osteosynthesefragen classification and Fernandez classification for distal radius fracture. Yinjie Y; Gen W; Hongbo W; Chongqing X; Fan Z; Yanqi F; Xuequn W; Wen M Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jan; 99(2):e18508. PubMed ID: 31914022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are distal radius fracture classifications reproducible? Intra and interobserver agreement. Belloti JC; Tamaoki MJ; Franciozi CE; Santos JB; Balbachevsky D; Chap Chap E; Albertoni WM; Faloppa F Sao Paulo Med J; 2008 May; 126(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 18711658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Classification of distal radius fractures: an analysis of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility. Andersen DJ; Blair WF; Steyers CM; Adams BD; el-Khouri GY; Brandser EA J Hand Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 21(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 8842946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and reproducibility of classifications for distal radius fractures. Küçük L; Kumbaracı M; Günay H; Karapınar L; Ozdemir O Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2013; 47(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 23748613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of simplified Frykman and AO classifications of fractures of the distal radius. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver agreement. Illarramendi A; González Della Valle A; Segal E; De Carli P; Maignon G; Gallucci G Int Orthop; 1998; 22(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 9651777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distal radius fractures are difficult to classify. Wæver D; Madsen ML; Rölfing JHD; Borris LC; Henriksen M; Nagel LL; Thorninger R Injury; 2018 Jun; 49 Suppl 1():S29-S32. PubMed ID: 29929689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Four distal radial fracture classification systems tested amongst a large panel of Dutch trauma surgeons. Ploegmakers JJ; Mader K; Pennig D; Verheyen CC Injury; 2007 Nov; 38(11):1268-72. PubMed ID: 17643439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Classification systems for distal radius fractures. Kleinlugtenbelt YV; Groen SR; Ham SJ; Kloen P; Haverlag R; Simons MP; Scholtes VAB; Bhandari M; Goslings JC; Poolman RW Acta Orthop; 2017 Dec; 88(6):681-687. PubMed ID: 28612669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does the CT improve inter- and intra-observer agreement for the AO, Fernandez and Universal classification systems for distal radius fractures? Arealis G; Galanopoulos I; Nikolaou VS; Lacon A; Ashwood N; Kitsis C Injury; 2014 Oct; 45(10):1579-84. PubMed ID: 25042062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The IDEAL classification system: a new method for classifying fractures of the distal extremity of the radius - description and reproducibility. Belloti JC; dos Santos JB; de Moraes VY; Wink FV; Tamaoki MJ; Faloppa F Sao Paulo Med J; 2013; 131(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 24141296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distal radius fractures: Classifications concordance among orthopedic residents on a teaching hospital. Peña-Martínez VM; Villanueva-Guerra E; Tamez-Mata Y; Simental-Mendía M; Gallardo-Madrid A; Blázquez-Saldaña J; Acosta-Olivo C J Orthop Sci; 2024 Jan; 29(1):133-137. PubMed ID: 36460558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the Fernandez classification for distal radius fractures. Naqvi SG; Reynolds T; Kitsis C J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2009 Aug; 34(4):483-5. PubMed ID: 19321533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Intra- and Interobserver Reproducibility of the New AO/OTA Classification for Distal Radius Fractures Compared with the Fernandez Classification. Carula BC; Giostri GS; Bebber F; Batista MFDS; Silva FBD; Novak EM Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo); 2022 Dec; 57(6):917-923. PubMed ID: 36540737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Consistency of AO fracture classification for the distal radius. Kreder HJ; Hanel DP; McKee M; Jupiter J; McGillivary G; Swiontkowski MF J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 Sep; 78(5):726-31. PubMed ID: 8836058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interobserver Agreement and Intraobserver Reproducibility of Barzullah Working Classification of Distal End Radius Fractures among Orthopaedic Residents. Kamal Y; Khan HA; Gani NU; Farooq M; Shah AB; Khan MA J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol; 2016 Feb; 21(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 27454498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Distal radius fractures: consistency of the classifications]. de Oliveira Filho OM; Belangero WD; Teles JB Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2004; 50(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 15253028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of different radiography systems in an experimental study for detection of forearm fractures and evaluation of the Müller-AO and Frykman classification for distal radius fractures. Metz S; Kuhn V; Kettler M; Hudelmaier M; Bonel HM; Waldt S; Hollweck R; Renger B; Rummeny EJ; Link TM Invest Radiol; 2006 Sep; 41(9):681-90. PubMed ID: 16896303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Classification of distal radius fractures in children: good inter- and intraobserver reliability, which improves with clinical experience. Randsborg PH; Sivertsen EA BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 Jan; 13():6. PubMed ID: 22269925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]