These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23721588)
1. Open-source platform to benchmark fingerprints for ligand-based virtual screening. Riniker S; Landrum GA J Cheminform; 2013 May; 5(1):26. PubMed ID: 23721588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Heterogeneous classifier fusion for ligand-based virtual screening: or, how decision making by committee can be a good thing. Riniker S; Fechner N; Landrum GA J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):2829-36. PubMed ID: 24171408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing structural fingerprints using a literature-based similarity benchmark. O'Boyle NM; Sayle RA J Cheminform; 2016; 8():36. PubMed ID: 27382417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis and comparison of 2D fingerprints: insights into database screening performance using eight fingerprint methods. Duan J; Dixon SL; Lowrie JF; Sherman W J Mol Graph Model; 2010 Sep; 29(2):157-70. PubMed ID: 20579912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stereoselective virtual screening of the ZINC database using atom pair 3D-fingerprints. Awale M; Jin X; Reymond JL J Cheminform; 2015; 7():3. PubMed ID: 25750664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of consensus scoring in ligand-based virtual screening. Baber JC; Shirley WA; Gao Y; Feher M J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):277-88. PubMed ID: 16426063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maximizing the Performance of Similarity-Based Virtual Screening Methods by Generating Synergy from the Integration of 2D and 3D Approaches. Fan N; Hirte S; Kirchmair J Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Jul; 23(14):. PubMed ID: 35887097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of the effects of related fingerprints on molecular similarity using an eigenvalue entropy approach. Kuwahara H; Gao X J Cheminform; 2021 Mar; 13(1):27. PubMed ID: 33757582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Condorcet and borda count fusion method for ligand-based virtual screening. Ahmed A; Saeed F; Salim N; Abdo A J Cheminform; 2014; 6():19. PubMed ID: 24883114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. REPROVIS-DB: a benchmark system for ligand-based virtual screening derived from reproducible prospective applications. Ripphausen P; Wassermann AM; Bajorath J J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Oct; 51(10):2467-73. PubMed ID: 21902278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Teaching an Old Dog New Tricks: Strategies That Improve Early Recognition in Similarity-Based Virtual Screening. Liu R; AbdulHameed MDM; Wallqvist A Front Chem; 2019; 7():701. PubMed ID: 31709231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How similar are similarity searching methods? A principal component analysis of molecular descriptor space. Bender A; Jenkins JL; Scheiber J; Sukuru SC; Glick M; Davies JW J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jan; 49(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 19123924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Large scale study of multiple-molecule queries. Nasr RJ; Swamidass SJ; Baldi PF J Cheminform; 2009 Jun; 1(1):7. PubMed ID: 20298525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward a benchmarking data set able to evaluate ligand- and structure-based virtual screening using public HTS data. Lindh M; Svensson F; Schaal W; Zhang J; Sköld C; Brandt P; Karlén A J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Feb; 55(2):343-53. PubMed ID: 25564966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Life beyond the Tanimoto coefficient: similarity measures for interaction fingerprints. Rácz A; Bajusz D; Héberger K J Cheminform; 2018 Oct; 10(1):48. PubMed ID: 30288626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]