These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23721648)

  • 1. Defining a novel k-nearest neighbours approach to assess the applicability domain of a QSAR model for reliable predictions.
    Sahigara F; Ballabio D; Todeschini R; Consonni V
    J Cheminform; 2013 May; 5(1):27. PubMed ID: 23721648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Applicability Domain Dependent Predictive Uncertainty in QSAR Regressions.
    Sahlin U; Jeliazkova N; Öberg T
    Mol Inform; 2014 Jan; 33(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 27485196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applicability Domain: A Step Toward Confident Predictions and Decidability for QSAR Modeling.
    Kar S; Roy K; Leszczynski J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1800():141-169. PubMed ID: 29934891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. QSAR applicabilty domain estimation by projection of the training set descriptor space: a review.
    Jaworska J; Nikolova-Jeliazkova N; Aldenberg T
    Altern Lab Anim; 2005 Oct; 33(5):445-59. PubMed ID: 16268757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of predictive QSAR models to database mining: identification and experimental validation of novel anticonvulsant compounds.
    Shen M; Béguin C; Golbraikh A; Stables JP; Kohn H; Tropsha A
    J Med Chem; 2004 Apr; 47(9):2356-64. PubMed ID: 15084134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The kernel-weighted local polynomial regression (KwLPR) approach: an efficient, novel tool for development of QSAR/QSAAR toxicity extrapolation models.
    Gajewicz-Skretna A; Kar S; Piotrowska M; Leszczynski J
    J Cheminform; 2021 Feb; 13(1):9. PubMed ID: 33579384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Kernel-Based Method for Assessing Uncertainty on Individual QSAR Predictions.
    Tebby C; Mombelli E
    Mol Inform; 2012 Oct; 31(10):741-51. PubMed ID: 27476456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rethinking the applicability domain analysis in QSAR models.
    Mora JR; Marquez EA; Pérez-Pérez N; Contreras-Torres E; Perez-Castillo Y; Agüero-Chapin G; Martinez-Rios F; Marrero-Ponce Y; Barigye SJ
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2024 Feb; 38(1):9. PubMed ID: 38351144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of different approaches to define the applicability domain of QSAR models.
    Sahigara F; Mansouri K; Ballabio D; Mauri A; Consonni V; Todeschini R
    Molecules; 2012 Apr; 17(5):4791-810. PubMed ID: 22534664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of the applicability domain of kernel-based machine learning models for virtual screening.
    Fechner N; Jahn A; Hinselmann G; Zell A
    J Cheminform; 2010 Mar; 2(1):2. PubMed ID: 20222949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficiency of different measures for defining the applicability domain of classification models.
    Klingspohn W; Mathea M; Ter Laak A; Heinrich N; Baumann K
    J Cheminform; 2017 Aug; 9(1):44. PubMed ID: 29086213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. GTM-Based QSAR Models and Their Applicability Domains.
    Gaspar HA; Baskin II; Marcou G; Horvath D; Varnek A
    Mol Inform; 2015 Jun; 34(6-7):348-56. PubMed ID: 27490381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combinatorial QSAR of ambergris fragrance compounds.
    Kovatcheva A; Golbraikh A; Oloff S; Xiao YD; Zheng W; Wolschann P; Buchbauer G; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(2):582-95. PubMed ID: 15032539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A stepwise approach for defining the applicability domain of SAR and QSAR models.
    Dimitrov S; Dimitrova G; Pavlov T; Dimitrova N; Patlewicz G; Niemela J; Mekenyan O
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(4):839-49. PubMed ID: 16045276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the validity of QSARs for ready biodegradability of chemicals: an applicability domain perspective.
    Sahigara F; Ballabio D; Todeschini R; Consonni V
    Curr Comput Aided Drug Des; 2014; 10(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 24724897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the reliability of a QSAR model's predictions.
    He L; Jurs PC
    J Mol Graph Model; 2005 Jun; 23(6):503-23. PubMed ID: 15896992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhancing Acute Oral Toxicity Predictions by using Consensus Modeling and Algebraic Form-Based 0D-to-2D Molecular Encodes.
    García-Jacas CR; Marrero-Ponce Y; Cortés-Guzmán F; Suárez-Lezcano J; Martinez-Rios FO; García-González LA; Pupo-Meriño M; Martinez-Mayorga K
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):1178-1192. PubMed ID: 31066547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rivality index neighbourhood algorithm with density and distances weighted schemes for the building of robust QSAR classification models with high reliable applicability domain.
    Luque Ruiz I; Gómez-Nieto MÁ
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2019 Aug; 30(8):587-615. PubMed ID: 31469296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CORAL: building up the model for bioconcentration factor and defining it's applicability domain.
    Toropov AA; Toropova AP; Lombardo A; Roncaglioni A; Benfenati E; Gini G
    Eur J Med Chem; 2011 Apr; 46(4):1400-3. PubMed ID: 21295893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
    Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.