423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23721713)
1. Oocyte efficiency: does live birth rate differ when analyzing cryopreserved and fresh oocytes on a per-oocyte basis?
Goldman KN; Noyes NL; Knopman JM; McCaffrey C; Grifo JA
Fertil Steril; 2013 Sep; 100(3):712-7. PubMed ID: 23721713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis.
Oktay K; Cil AP; Bang H
Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 16818031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval.
Doyle JO; Richter KS; Lim J; Stillman RJ; Graham JR; Tucker MJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):459-66.e2. PubMed ID: 26604065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective pilot study comparing fertilization and embryo development between fresh and vitrified sibling oocytes.
Siano L; Engmann L; Nulsen J; Benadiva C
Conn Med; 2013 Apr; 77(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 23691734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multicenter observational study on slow-cooling oocyte cryopreservation: clinical outcome.
Borini A; Levi Setti PE; Anserini P; De Luca R; De Santis L; Porcu E; La Sala GB; Ferraretti A; Bartolotti T; Coticchio G; Scaravelli G
Fertil Steril; 2010 Oct; 94(5):1662-8. PubMed ID: 20047739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Delivery rate using cryopreserved oocytes is comparable to conventional in vitro fertilization using fresh oocytes: potential fertility preservation for female cancer patients.
Grifo JA; Noyes N
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):391-6. PubMed ID: 19439285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence-based outcomes after oocyte cryopreservation for donor oocyte in vitro fertilization and planned oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline.
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org
Fertil Steril; 2021 Jul; 116(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 34148587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The singleton, term gestation, and live birth rate per cycle initiated: a 1-year experience in in vitro fertilization cycles with native and donated oocytes.
Bellver J; Albert C; Soares SR; Alvarez C; Pellicer A
Fertil Steril; 2005 May; 83(5):1404-9. PubMed ID: 15866576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of 2,386 consecutive cycles of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection using autologous oocytes in women aged 40 years and above.
Serour G; Mansour R; Serour A; Aboulghar M; Amin Y; Kamal O; Al-Inany H; Aboulghar M
Fertil Steril; 2010 Oct; 94(5):1707-12. PubMed ID: 19896654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.
Crawford S; Boulet SL; Kawwass JF; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27842997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproductive potential of a metaphase II oocyte retrieved after ovarian stimulation: an analysis of 23 354 ICSI cycles.
Stoop D; Ermini B; Polyzos NP; Haentjens P; De Vos M; Verheyen G; Devroey P
Hum Reprod; 2012 Jul; 27(7):2030-5. PubMed ID: 22552690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Association of Fresh Embryo Transfers Compared With Cryopreserved-Thawed Embryo Transfers With Live Birth Rate Among Women Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Using Freshly Retrieved Donor Oocytes.
Insogna IG; Lanes A; Lee MS; Ginsburg ES; Fox JH
JAMA; 2021 Jan; 325(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 33433574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting the likelihood of live birth for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a counseling tool for physicians and patients.
Goldman RH; Racowsky C; Farland LV; Munné S; Ribustello L; Fox JH
Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):853-859. PubMed ID: 28166330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expanding reproductive lifespan: a cost-effectiveness study on oocyte freezing.
van Loendersloot LL; Moolenaar LM; Mol BW; Repping S; van der Veen F; Goddijn M
Hum Reprod; 2011 Nov; 26(11):3054-60. PubMed ID: 21896545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology].
Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of live birth rates and perinatal outcomes between cryopreserved oocytes and cryopreserved embryos.
Ho JR; Woo I; Louie K; Salem W; Jabara SI; Bendikson KA; Paulson RJ; Chung K
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Oct; 34(10):1359-1366. PubMed ID: 28718080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony.
Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Garner FC; Aguirre M; Ross R
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17224151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Similar ongoing pregnancy rates after blastocyst transfer in fresh donor cycles and autologous cycles using cryopreserved bipronuclear oocytes suggest similar viability of transferred blastocysts.
Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Garner FC; Aguirre M; Hudson C; Thomas S
Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):319-21. PubMed ID: 19683230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes in anonymous shared versus exclusive donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles.
Mullin CM; Fino ME; Talebian S; Keegan D; Grifo JA; Licciardi F
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):574-8. PubMed ID: 19815192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Association of number of retrieved oocytes with live birth rate and birth weight: an analysis of 231,815 cycles of in vitro fertilization.
Baker VL; Brown MB; Luke B; Conrad KP
Fertil Steril; 2015 Apr; 103(4):931-938.e2. PubMed ID: 25638421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
