BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

758 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23722573)

  • 1. Effect of mental processing on low back load while lifting an object.
    Katsuhira J; Matsudaira K; Iwakiri K; Kimura Y; Ohashi T; Ono R; Sugita S; Fukuda K; Abe S; Maruyama H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E832-9. PubMed ID: 23722573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Arjmand N
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):687-99. PubMed ID: 17103232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of lifting speed on the peak external forward bending, lateral bending, and twisting spine moments.
    Lavender SA; Li YC; Andersson GB; Natarajan RN
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 9973875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative analysis of low-back loading on chiropractors using various workstation table heights and performing various tasks.
    Lorme KJ; Naqvi SA
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003 Jan; 26(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 12532135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo loads on a vertebral body replacement during different lifting techniques.
    Dreischarf M; Rohlmann A; Graichen F; Bergmann G; Schmidt H
    J Biomech; 2016 Apr; 49(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 26603872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading.
    Kingma I; Bosch T; Bruins L; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2004 Oct; 47(13):1365-85. PubMed ID: 15513714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spinal stability and role of passive stiffness in dynamic squat and stoop lifts.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2007 Oct; 10(5):351-60. PubMed ID: 17852177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of posture on dynamic back loading during a cable lifting task.
    Gallagher S; Marras WS; Davis KG; Kovacs K
    Ergonomics; 2002 Apr; 45(5):380-98. PubMed ID: 12028722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of pelvic forward tilt on low back compressive and shear forces during a manual lifting task.
    Hayashi S; Katsuhira J; Matsudaira K; Maruyama H
    J Phys Ther Sci; 2016 Mar; 28(3):802-6. PubMed ID: 27134361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The assessment of material handling strategies in dealing with sudden loading: the effects of load handling position on trunk biomechanics.
    Ning X; Zhou J; Dai B; Jaridi M
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Nov; 45(6):1399-405. PubMed ID: 24766903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of mental processing and pacing on spine loading: 2002 Volvo Award in biomechanics.
    Davis KG; Marras WS; Heaney CA; Waters TR; Gupta P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Dec; 27(23):2645-53. PubMed ID: 12461390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.
    Chaffin DB; Page GB
    Ergonomics; 1994 Apr; 37(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 8187750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lumbosacral compression in maximal lifting efforts in sagittal plane with varying mechanical disadvantage in isometric and isokinetic modes.
    Kumar S
    Ergonomics; 1994 Dec; 37(12):1975-83. PubMed ID: 7828579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Supporting the upper body with the hand on the thigh reduces back loading during lifting.
    Kingma I; Faber GS; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2016 Apr; 49(6):881-889. PubMed ID: 26475223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of control strategies for an active back-support exoskeleton on spine loading and kinematics during lifting.
    Koopman AS; Toxiri S; Power V; Kingma I; van Dieën JH; Ortiz J; de Looze MP
    J Biomech; 2019 Jun; 91():14-22. PubMed ID: 31122661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to lift a box that is too large to fit between the knees.
    Kingma I; Faber GS; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2010 Oct; 53(10):1228-38. PubMed ID: 20865606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lower extremity joint kinetics and lumbar curvature during squat and stoop lifting.
    Hwang S; Kim Y; Kim Y
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2009 Feb; 10():15. PubMed ID: 19183507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bending and compressive stresses acting on the lumbar spine during lifting activities.
    Dolan P; Earley M; Adams MA
    J Biomech; 1994 Oct; 27(10):1237-48. PubMed ID: 7962011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of floor slope and load carriage on standing posture.
    Reiser RF; Dalton EA
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2005; 41():25-30. PubMed ID: 15850077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.