151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23722978)
1. The truth about chickens and bats: ambiguity avoidance distinguishes types of polysemy.
Rabagliati H; Snedeker J
Psychol Sci; 2013 Jul; 24(7):1354-60. PubMed ID: 23722978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Word Senses as Clusters of Meaning Modulations: A Computational Model of Polysemy.
Li J; Joanisse MF
Cogn Sci; 2021 Apr; 45(4):e12955. PubMed ID: 33873247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Making sense of word senses: the comprehension of polysemy depends on sense overlap.
Klepousniotou E; Titone D; Romero C
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1534-43. PubMed ID: 18980412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Polysemy and the subjective lexicon: semantic relatedness and the salience of intraword senses.
Durkin K; Manning J
J Psycholinguist Res; 1989 Nov; 18(6):577-612. PubMed ID: 2632800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sustained meaning activation for polysemous but not homonymous words: evidence from EEG.
MacGregor LJ; Bouwsema J; Klepousniotou E
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Feb; 68():126-38. PubMed ID: 25576909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hemispheric asymmetries in semantic processing: evidence from false memories for ambiguous words.
Faust M; Ben-Artzi E; Harel I
Brain Lang; 2008 Jun; 105(3):220-8. PubMed ID: 18178246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Probing Lexical Ambiguity: Word Vectors Encode Number and Relatedness of Senses.
Beekhuizen B; Armstrong BC; Stevenson S
Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 45(5):e12943. PubMed ID: 34018227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of homonymy and polysemy on lexical access: an MEG study.
Beretta A; Fiorentino R; Poeppel D
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 15922158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polysemy Advantage with Abstract But Not Concrete Words.
Jager B; Cleland AA
J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Feb; 45(1):143-56. PubMed ID: 25373555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Opposing effects of semantic diversity in lexical and semantic relatedness decisions.
Hoffman P; Woollams AM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Apr; 41(2):385-402. PubMed ID: 25751041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Age of acquisition estimates for 1,208 ambiguous and polysemous words.
Khanna MM; Cortese MJ
Behav Res Methods; 2011 Mar; 43(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 21287120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Brain representations of lexical ambiguity: Disentangling homonymy, polysemy, and their meanings.
Liang X; Huang F; Liu D; Xu M
Brain Lang; 2024 Jun; 253():105426. PubMed ID: 38815503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Not all ambiguous words are created equal: an EEG investigation of homonymy and polysemy.
Klepousniotou E; Pike GB; Steinhauer K; Gracco V
Brain Lang; 2012 Oct; 123(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 22819308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Probing the Representational Structure of Regular Polysemy via Sense Analogy Questions: Insights from Contextual Word Vectors.
Li J; Armstrong BC
Cogn Sci; 2024 Mar; 48(3):e13416. PubMed ID: 38482721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The influence of semantic richness on the visual recognition of emotional words].
Syssau A; Laxén J
Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Mar; 66(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 22390477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The processing of lexical ambiguity: homonymy and polysemy in the mental lexicon.
Klepousniotou E
Brain Lang; 2002; 81(1-3):205-23. PubMed ID: 12081393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Children make use of relationships across meanings in word learning.
Floyd S; Goldberg AE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):29-44. PubMed ID: 32105145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Processing homonymy and polysemy: effects of sentential context and time-course following unilateral brain damage.
Klepousniotou E; Baum SR
Brain Lang; 2005 Dec; 95(3):365-82. PubMed ID: 16298667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The representation of polysemy: MEG evidence.
Pylkkänen L; Llinás R; Murphy GL
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 16417686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Settling Into Semantic Space: An Ambiguity-Focused Account of Word-Meaning Access.
Rodd JM
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 Mar; 15(2):411-427. PubMed ID: 31961780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
