211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23724546)
21. One-year evaluation of a simplified ethanol-wet bonding technique: a randomized clinical trial.
Araújo JF; Barros TA; Braga EM; Loretto SC; Silva e Souza Pde A; Silva e Souza MH
Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 23969918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
Franco EB; Benetti AR; Ishikiriama SK; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Jorge MF; Navarro MF
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 16924979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of two all-in-one adhesives bonded to non-carious cervical lesions--results at 3 years.
Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1089-94. PubMed ID: 21789590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A 13-year clinical evaluation of two three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives in non-carious class-V lesions.
Peumans M; De Munck J; Van Landuyt KL; Poitevin A; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 20931252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. 36-month clinical evaluation of two adhesives and microhybrid resin composites in Class I restorations.
Swift EJ; Ritter AV; Heymann HO; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD
Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 18686764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining.
Guéders AM; Charpentier JF; Albert AI; Geerts SO
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 16924985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-year clinical performance of a HEMA-free one-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions.
Van Landuyt KL; Peumans M; De Munck J; Cardoso MV; Ermis B; Van Meerbeek B
Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Dec; 119(6):511-6. PubMed ID: 22112039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Eighteen-month clinical performance of a self-etching primer in unprepared class V resin restorations.
Brackett WW; Brackett MG; Dib A; Franco G; Estudillo H
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 16130861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The clinical effectiveness of various adhesive systems: an 18-month evaluation.
Moosavi H; Kimyai S; Forghani M; Khodadadi R
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 22917442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Class II composite restorations: importance of cervical enamel in vitro.
Laegreid T; Gjerdet NR; Vult von Steyern P; Johansson AK
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 21777100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies: 18-month results.
Perdigão J; Dutra-Corrêa M; Saraceni CH; Ciaramicoli MT; Kiyan VH; Queiroz CS
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 21942235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. One-year Clinical Evaluation of Resin Composite Restorations of Noncarious Cervical Lesions in Smokers.
de Carvalho LD; Gondo R; Lopes GC
J Adhes Dent; 2015 Aug; 17(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 26525004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.
Brackett MG; Dib A; Brackett WW; Estrada BE; Reyes AA
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Four-year clinical evaluation of Class II nano-hybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch and a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
J Dent; 2011 Jan; 39(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 20933047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Three-year clinical evaluation of cuspal coverage with combined composite-amalgam in endodontically-treated maxillary premolars.
Shafiei F; Memarpour M; Doozandeh M
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 21179997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. One-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without additional enamel etching technique in cervical lesions.
Ozel E; Say EC; Yurdaguven H; Soyman M
Aust Dent J; 2010 Jun; 55(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 20604757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions.
Kubo S; Yokota H; Yokota H; Hayashi Y
J Dent; 2010 Mar; 38(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 19840829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Five-year clinical performance of the dentine deproteinization technique in non-carious cervical lesions.
Rocha Gomes Torres C; Barcellos DC; Batista GR; Pucci CR; Antunes MJ; de La Cruz DB; Borges AB
J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):816-23. PubMed ID: 24739486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.
Kiremitci A; Alpaslan T; Gurgan S
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 19192832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
