239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23724770)
1. ImPact test-retest reliability: reliably unreliable?
Resch J; Driscoll A; McCaffrey N; Brown C; Ferrara MS; Macciocchi S; Baumgartner T; Walpert K
J Athl Train; 2013; 48(4):506-11. PubMed ID: 23724770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The test-retest reliability of three computerized neurocognitive tests used in the assessment of sport concussion.
Resch JE; Schneider MW; Munro Cullum C
Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt A):31-38. PubMed ID: 28935224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Test-retest reliability of computerized concussion assessment programs.
Broglio SP; Ferrara MS; Macciocchi SN; Baumgartner TA; Elliott R
J Athl Train; 2007; 42(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18174939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Examination of the Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test Battery.
Nakayama Y; Covassin T; Schatz P; Nogle S; Kovan J
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 42(8):2000-5. PubMed ID: 24907286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the test-retest reliability of symptom indices associated with the ImPACT post-concussion symptom scale (PCSS).
Merritt VC; Bradson ML; Meyer JE; Arnett PA
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2018 May; 40(4):377-388. PubMed ID: 28728465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Concussion Test: CNS Vital Signs.
Littleton AC; Register-Mihalik JK; Guskiewicz KM
Sports Health; 2015; 7(5):443-7. PubMed ID: 26502421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of validity criteria on Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) test-retest reliability among high school athletes.
Brett BL; Solomon GS
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2017 Apr; 39(3):286-295. PubMed ID: 27585635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test in Baseline Concussion Testing of High School Athletes.
MacDonald J; Duerson D
Clin J Sport Med; 2015 Jul; 25(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 25061807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Test-retest, retest, and retest: Growth curve models of repeat testing with Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT).
Maerlender AC; Masterson CJ; James TD; Beckwith J; Brolinson PG; Crisco J; Duma S; Flashman LA; Greenwald R; Rowson S; Wilcox B; McAllister TW
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2016 Oct; 38(8):869-74. PubMed ID: 27266563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short-term test-retest reliability of the ImPACT in healthy young athletes.
O'Brien AM; Casey JE; Salmon RM
Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2018; 7(3):208-216. PubMed ID: 28631965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repeated computerized cognitive testing: Performance shifts and test-retest reliability in healthy older adults.
White N; Flannery L; McClintock A; Machado L
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2019 Mar; 41(2):179-191. PubMed ID: 30320531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. 1 year test-retest reliability of ImPACT in professional ice hockey players.
Bruce J; Echemendia R; Meeuwisse W; Comper P; Sisco A
Clin Neuropsychol; 2014; 28(1):14-25. PubMed ID: 24345194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do Sideline Concussion Assessments Predict Subsequent Neurocognitive Impairment After Sport-Related Concussion?
Sufrinko A; McAllister-Deitrick J; Womble M; Kontos A
J Athl Train; 2017 Jul; 52(7):676-681. PubMed ID: 28535099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective, Head-to-Head Study of Three Computerized Neurocognitive Assessment Tools (CNTs): Reliability and Validity for the Assessment of Sport-Related Concussion.
Nelson LD; LaRoche AA; Pfaller AY; Lerner EB; Hammeke TA; Randolph C; Barr WB; Guskiewicz K; McCrea MA
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2016 Jan; 22(1):24-37. PubMed ID: 26714883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship Between the King-Devick Test and Commonly Used Concussion Tests at Baseline.
Clugston JR; Houck ZM; Asken BM; Boone JK; Kontos AP; Buckley TA; Schmidt JD; Chrisman SPD; Hoffman NL; Harmon KG; Kaminski TW; Collins MW; McAllister TW; McCrea MA; Broglio SP; Ortega JD
J Athl Train; 2019 Dec; 54(12):1247-1253. PubMed ID: 31584854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Test-Retest Reliability of Computerized Neurocognitive Testing in Youth Ice Hockey Players.
Womble MN; Reynolds E; Schatz P; Shah KM; Kontos AP
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2016 Jun; 31(4):305-12. PubMed ID: 27084734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Test-retest reliability and practice effects for the ANAM General Neuropsychological Screening battery.
Vincent AS; Roebuck-Spencer TM; Fuenzalida E; Gilliland K
Clin Neuropsychol; 2018 Apr; 32(3):479-494. PubMed ID: 28832273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. One-year test-retest reliability of the online version of ImPACT in high school athletes.
Elbin RJ; Schatz P; Covassin T
Am J Sports Med; 2011 Nov; 39(11):2319-24. PubMed ID: 21841066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computerized neuropsychological profiles of South African versus US athletes: a basis for commentary on cross-cultural norming issues in the sports concussion arena.
Shuttleworth-Edwards AB; Whitefield-Alexander VJ; Radloff SE; Taylor AM; Lovell MR
Phys Sportsmed; 2009 Dec; 37(4):45-52. PubMed ID: 20048540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of Computerized Neurocognitive Tests for Concussion Assessment: A Meta-Analysis.
Farnsworth JL; Dargo L; Ragan BG; Kang M
J Athl Train; 2017 Sep; 52(9):826-833. PubMed ID: 28771032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
