240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23724770)
21. Reliability of Computerized Neurocognitive Tests for Concussion Assessment: A Meta-Analysis.
Farnsworth JL; Dargo L; Ragan BG; Kang M
J Athl Train; 2017 Sep; 52(9):826-833. PubMed ID: 28771032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluating the suitability of the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) computerized neurocognitive battery for short-term, serial assessment of neurocognitive functioning.
Elbin RJ; Fazio-Sumrok V; Anderson MN; D'Amico NR; Said A; Grossel A; Schatz P; Lipinski D; Womble M
J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 62():138-141. PubMed ID: 30472342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Test-Retest Reliability of a Functional Reaction Time Assessment Battery.
Lynall RC; Johnson RS; Lempke LB; Schmidt JD
J Sport Rehabil; 2021 May; 30(8):1237-1241. PubMed ID: 33952713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reliability of Cognitive Measures in Individuals With a Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.
Nightingale TE; Lim CAR; Sachdeva R; Zheng MMZ; Phillips AA; Krassioukov A
PM R; 2019 Dec; 11(12):1278-1286. PubMed ID: 30900829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Tandem Gait Test-Retest Reliability Among Healthy Child and Adolescent Athletes.
Howell DR; Brilliant AN; Meehan WP
J Athl Train; 2019 Dec; 54(12):1254-1259. PubMed ID: 31657636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Immediate Post-concussion and Cognitive Testing: Ceiling Effects, Reliability, and Implications for Interpretation.
Gaudet CE; Konin J; Faust D
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2021 May; 36(4):561-569. PubMed ID: 32978632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Near Point of Convergence After a Sport-Related Concussion: Measurement Reliability and Relationship to Neurocognitive Impairment and Symptoms.
Pearce KL; Sufrinko A; Lau BC; Henry L; Collins MW; Kontos AP
Am J Sports Med; 2015 Dec; 43(12):3055-61. PubMed ID: 26453625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Psychometric Properties of Computerized Cognitive Tools and Standard Neuropsychological Tests Used to Assess Sport Concussion: A Systematic Review.
Wilmoth K; Brett BL; Emmert NA; Cook CM; Schaffert J; Caze T; Kotsonis T; Cusick M; Solomon G; Resch JE; Cullum CM; Nelson LD; McCrea M
Neuropsychol Rev; 2023 Dec; 33(4):675-692. PubMed ID: 36040610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Balance Assessment in Sports-Related Concussion: Evaluating Test-Retest Reliability of the Equilibrate System.
Odom MJ; Lee YM; Zuckerman SL; Apple RP; Germanos T; Solomon GS; Sills AK
J Surg Orthop Adv; 2016; 25(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 27518293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of a simple test of reaction time for baseline concussion testing in a population of high school athletes.
MacDonald J; Wilson J; Young J; Duerson D; Swisher G; Collins CL; Meehan WP
Clin J Sport Med; 2015 Jan; 25(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 24727576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Test-Retest, Interrater Reliability, and Minimal Detectable Change of the Dynamic Exertion Test (EXiT) for Concussion.
Sinnott AM; Eagle SR; Kochick V; Bricker IR; Collins MW; Sparto PJ; Flanagan SD; Elbin RJ; Connaboy C; Kontos AP
Sports Health; 2023 May; 15(3):410-421. PubMed ID: 35678147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Test-Retest Reliability of the King-Devick Test in an Adolescent Population.
Oberlander TJ; Olson BL; Weidauer L
J Athl Train; 2017 May; 52(5):439-445. PubMed ID: 28362161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Test-Retest Reliability and the Effects of Exercise on the King-Devick Test.
Eddy R; Goetschius J; Hertel J; Resch J
Clin J Sport Med; 2020 May; 30(3):239-244. PubMed ID: 32341291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reliability and validity of a self-administered tool for online neuropsychological testing: The Amsterdam Cognition Scan.
Feenstra HEM; Murre JMJ; Vermeulen IE; Kieffer JM; Schagen SB
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2018 Apr; 40(3):253-273. PubMed ID: 28671504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A two-factor theory for concussion assessment using ImPACT: memory and speed.
Schatz P; Maerlender A
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2013 Dec; 28(8):791-7. PubMed ID: 24123401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. One year test-retest reliability of neurocognitive baseline scores in 10- to 12-year olds.
Moser RS; Schatz P; Grosner E; Kollias K
Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2017; 6(2):166-171. PubMed ID: 27182767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. King-Devick Test Reliability in National Collegiate Athletic Association Athletes: A National Collegiate Athletic Association-Department of Defense Concussion Assessment, Research and Education Report.
Breedlove KM; Ortega JD; Kaminski TW; Harmon KG; Schmidt JD; Kontos AP; Clugston JR; Chrisman SPD; McCrea MA; McAllister TW; Broglio SP; Buckley TA
J Athl Train; 2019 Dec; 54(12):1241-1246. PubMed ID: 31618072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Test-retest reliability of four computerized neurocognitive assessment tools in an active duty military population.
Cole WR; Arrieux JP; Schwab K; Ivins BJ; Qashu FM; Lewis SC
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2013 Nov; 28(7):732-42. PubMed ID: 23819991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. One-month test-retest reliability of the ImPACT test battery.
Schatz P; Ferris CS
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2013 Aug; 28(5):499-504. PubMed ID: 23702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Age-related differences and reliability on computerized and paper-and-pencil neurocognitive assessment batteries.
Register-Mihalik JK; Kontos DL; Guskiewicz KM; Mihalik JP; Conder R; Shields EW
J Athl Train; 2012; 47(3):297-305. PubMed ID: 22892411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
