245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23725127)
21. The contribution of mammography screening to breast cancer incidence trends in the United States: an updated age-period-cohort model.
Gangnon RE; Sprague BL; Stout NK; Alagoz O; Weedon-Fekjær H; Holford TR; Trentham-Dietz A
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2015 Jun; 24(6):905-12. PubMed ID: 25787716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography.
Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
J Digit Imaging; 2006 Sep; 19(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 16741664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Comparative analysis of early diagnostic tools for breast cancer].
Shen SJ; Sun Q; Xu YL; Zhou YD; Guan JH; Mao F; Lin Y; Wang XJ; Han SM
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 34(11):877-80. PubMed ID: 23291142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography in the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer.
Ali-Mucheru M; Pockaj B; Patel B; Pizzitola V; Wasif N; Stucky CC; Gray R
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):649-655. PubMed ID: 27638679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Predictive Factors for Positive Margin and the Surgical Learning Curve in Non-Palpable Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Localization - Prospective Study of 214 Consecutive Patients.
Tóth D; Varga Z; Sebő É; Török M; Kovács I
Pathol Oncol Res; 2016 Jan; 22(1):209-15. PubMed ID: 26522009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sydney Breast Imaging Accuracy Study: Comparative sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in young women with symptoms.
Houssami N; Irwig L; Simpson JM; McKessar M; Blome S; Noakes J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):935-40. PubMed ID: 12646432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Second reading of breast imaging at the hospital department of radiology: reasonable or waste of money?].
Teifke A; Vomweg TW; Hlawatsch A; Nasresfahani A; Kern A; Victor A; Schmidt M; Bittinger F; Düber C
Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):330-6. PubMed ID: 16508842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Role of ultrasonography in the detection of intraductal spread of breast cancer: correlation with pathologic findings, mammography and MR imaging.
Satake H; Shimamoto K; Sawaki A; Niimi R; Ando Y; Ishiguchi T; Ishigaki T; Yamakawa K; Nagasaka T; Funahashi H
Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(11):1726-32. PubMed ID: 11097398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical outcome assessment in mammography: an audit of 7,506 screening and diagnostic mammography examinations.
Tunçbilek I; Ozdemir A; Gültekin S; Oğur T; Erman R; Yüce C
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2007 Dec; 13(4):183-7. PubMed ID: 18092288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The value of mammography within 1 year of conservative surgery for breast cancer.
Lewis JL; Tartter PI
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Oct; 19(10):3218-22. PubMed ID: 22766990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Screening ultrasonography revealed 15% of mammographically occult breast cancers.
Uchida K; Yamashita A; Kawase K; Kamiya K
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 18224382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in ultrasonography-detected breast cancers.
Nam KJ; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Ko EY; Jeong DW; Choo KS
Breast; 2015 Oct; 24(5):649-55. PubMed ID: 26292782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Ultrasound detection of breast cancer with normal mammogram].
Schlecht I; Hadijuana J; Hosten N; Oellinger H; Minguillon C; Bomhard T; Lichtenegger W; Felix R
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Sep; 5(5):297-300. PubMed ID: 7495891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A cost-effective handheld breast scanner for use in low-resource environments: a validation study.
Broach RB; Geha R; Englander BS; DeLaCruz L; Thrash H; Brooks AD
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 14(1):277. PubMed ID: 27793162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Focal breast pain: imaging evaluation and outcomes.
Owen WA; Brazeal HA; Shaw HL; Lee MV; Appleton CM; Holley SO
Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():148-155. PubMed ID: 30825809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Radiologic-histopathologic correlation of microcalcifications from 11g vacuum biopsy: analysis of 3196 core biopsies].
Fischmann A; Pietsch-Breitfeld B; Müller-Schimpfle M; Siegmann K; Wersebe A; Rothenberger-Janzen K; Claussen CD; Janzen J
Rofo; 2004 Apr; 176(4):538-43. PubMed ID: 15088178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Detection of invasive breast lobular carcinoma by image analysis: comparison between mammography and ultrasound].
López-Narváez RA; Garza-Montemayor ML; Garza-García NL; Ojeda-Mendez EE; Rangel-Nava H; Méndez-Lozano D; Morales-Caballero FG
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2012 May; 80(5):320-6. PubMed ID: 23301423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
