These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23725374)

  • 21. MICheck: a web tool for fast checking of syntactic annotations of bacterial genomes.
    Cruveiller S; Le Saux J; Vallenet D; Lajus A; Bocs S; Médigue C
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2005 Jul; 33(Web Server issue):W471-9. PubMed ID: 15980515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A procedure for assessing GO annotation consistency.
    Dolan ME; Ni L; Camon E; Blake JA
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21 Suppl 1():i136-43. PubMed ID: 15961450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. SEED servers: high-performance access to the SEED genomes, annotations, and metabolic models.
    Aziz RK; Devoid S; Disz T; Edwards RA; Henry CS; Olsen GJ; Olson R; Overbeek R; Parrello B; Pusch GD; Stevens RL; Vonstein V; Xia F
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e48053. PubMed ID: 23110173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Gene Annotation Easy Viewer (GAEV): Integrating KEGG's Gene Function Annotations and Associated Molecular Pathways.
    Huynh T; Xu S
    F1000Res; 2018; 7():416. PubMed ID: 30705748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The use of semantic similarity measures for optimally integrating heterogeneous Gene Ontology data from large scale annotation pipelines.
    Mazandu GK; Mulder NJ
    Front Genet; 2014; 5():264. PubMed ID: 25147557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A domain-centric solution to functional genomics via dcGO Predictor.
    Fang H; Gough J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013; 14 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S9. PubMed ID: 23514627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. RATT: Rapid Annotation Transfer Tool.
    Otto TD; Dillon GP; Degrave WS; Berriman M
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 May; 39(9):e57. PubMed ID: 21306991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A post-assembly genome-improvement toolkit (PAGIT) to obtain annotated genomes from contigs.
    Swain MT; Tsai IJ; Assefa SA; Newbold C; Berriman M; Otto TD
    Nat Protoc; 2012 Jun; 7(7):1260-84. PubMed ID: 22678431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genix: a new online automated pipeline for bacterial genome annotation.
    Kremer FS; Eslabão MR; Dellagostin OA; Pinto LD
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2016 Dec; 363(23):. PubMed ID: 27856568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Saccharomyces cerevisiae: gene annotation and genome variability, state of the art through comparative genomics.
    Louis E
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 759():31-40. PubMed ID: 21863479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Repertoire-wide gene structure analyses: a case study comparing automatically predicted and manually annotated gene models.
    Wilbrandt J; Misof B; Panfilio KA; Niehuis O
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Oct; 20(1):753. PubMed ID: 31623555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Method for Improving the Accuracy and Efficiency of Bacteriophage Genome Annotation.
    Salisbury A; Tsourkas PK
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Jul; 20(14):. PubMed ID: 31295925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An evaluation of GO annotation retrieval for BioCreAtIvE and GOA.
    Camon EB; Barrell DG; Dimmer EC; Lee V; Magrane M; Maslen J; Binns D; Apweiler R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S17. PubMed ID: 15960829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Annotation confidence score for genome annotation: a genome comparison approach.
    Yang Y; Gilbert D; Kim S
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 26(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 19855104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using computational predictions to improve literature-based Gene Ontology annotations: a feasibility study.
    Costanzo MC; Park J; Balakrishnan R; Cherry JM; Hong EL
    Database (Oxford); 2011; 2011():bar004. PubMed ID: 21411447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of genome annotation using gene function similarity within the gene neighborhood.
    Jun SR; Nookaew I; Hauser L; Gorin A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):345. PubMed ID: 28724412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A nuclear magnetic resonance based approach to accurate functional annotation of putative enzymes in the methanogen Methanosarcina acetivorans.
    Chen Y; Apolinario E; Brachova L; Kelman Z; Li Z; Nikolau BJ; Showman L; Sowers K; Orban J
    BMC Genomics; 2011 Jun; 12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S7. PubMed ID: 21810209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Structural and functional-annotation of an equine whole genome oligoarray.
    Bright LA; Burgess SC; Chowdhary B; Swiderski CE; McCarthy FM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Oct; 10 Suppl 11(Suppl 11):S8. PubMed ID: 19811692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation and integration of functional annotation pipelines for newly sequenced organisms: the potato genome as a test case.
    Amar D; Frades I; Danek A; Goldberg T; Sharma SK; Hedley PE; Proux-Wera E; Andreasson E; Shamir R; Tzfadia O; Alexandersson E
    BMC Plant Biol; 2014 Dec; 14():329. PubMed ID: 25476999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. REPARATION: ribosome profiling assisted (re-)annotation of bacterial genomes.
    Ndah E; Jonckheere V; Giess A; Valen E; Menschaert G; Van Damme P
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Nov; 45(20):e168. PubMed ID: 28977509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.