199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23726824)
1. Submission of articles to Vaccine: a fast and fair peer review process.
de Hon F; Poland GA
Vaccine; 2013 Jul; 31(32):3207-8. PubMed ID: 23726824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review processes at the Health Information and Libraries Journal.
Grant MJ
Health Info Libr J; 2018 Dec; 35(4):263-264. PubMed ID: 30499172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How does peer review work?
Aaron L
Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Support for peer review.
Nat Immunol; 2010 Dec; 11(12):1063. PubMed ID: 21079625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. What can CCR do for you?
Potash J; Anderson KC
Clin Cancer Res; 2010 Aug; 16(16):4069-70. PubMed ID: 20682715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Registered reports: prospective peer review emphasizes science over spin.
Wilkinson J; Pellicer A; Niederberger C
Fertil Steril; 2019 May; 111(5):831-832. PubMed ID: 30955845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The art of peer review.
Oumeish OY
Skinmed; 2008; 7(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 18174795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The peer review process: a primer for
Hirsch JA; Manchikanti L; Albuquerque FC; Leslie-Mazwi TM; Lev MH; Linfante I; Mocco J; Rai AT; Schaefer PW; Tarr RW
J Neurointerv Surg; 2017 Jul; 9(e1):e3-e6. PubMed ID: 25888447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
Nahata MC
Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increasing challenges for an effective peer-review process.
Hak DJ; Giannoudis P; Mauffrey C
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Feb; 26(2):117-8. PubMed ID: 26724808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer review perspective for early career psychiatrists.
Gelenberg AJ
J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1599. PubMed ID: 20031101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. How would you recognise a good review?
Perkins D
Aust J Rural Health; 2014 Aug; 22(4):143-4. PubMed ID: 25123615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals.
Smith R
J R Soc Med; 2006 Apr; 99(4):178-82. PubMed ID: 16574968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer review in early career: just say yes!
Roy-Byrne PP
J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1602-3. PubMed ID: 20031104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review by early career psychiatrists: an opportunity for development.
Gross AF; Wiechers IR; Stern TA
J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1600-1. PubMed ID: 20031102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Celebrating the quality of our referees.
Forsythe ID
J Physiol; 2017 Oct; 595(20):6369-6370. PubMed ID: 28884466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. More than 1000 new manuscripts in 2017.
Glimelius B
Acta Oncol; 2018 Feb; 57(2):174-175. PubMed ID: 29303398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Opening up Peer Review.
DePellegrin TA; Johnston M
Genetics; 2020 Nov; 216(3):619-620. PubMed ID: 33158984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Journal peer review. The need for a research agenda.
Bailar JC; Patterson K
N Engl J Med; 1985 Mar; 312(10):654-7. PubMed ID: 3974641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
Eur Psychiatry; 2009 Mar; 24(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 19248983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
