These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23727377)
41. Semiautomatic vessel wall detection and quantification of wall thickness in computed tomography images of human abdominal aortic aneurysms. Shum J; DiMartino ES; Goldhamme A; Goldman DH; Acker LC; Patel G; Ng JH; Martufi G; Finol EA Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):638-48. PubMed ID: 20229873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A modern experience with saccular aortic aneurysms. Shang EK; Nathan DP; Boonn WW; Lys-Dobradin IA; Fairman RM; Woo EY; Wang GJ; Jackson BM J Vasc Surg; 2013 Jan; 57(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 23127980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Measurements and detection of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth: Accuracy and reproducibility of a segmentation software. Kauffmann C; Tang A; Therasse E; Giroux MF; Elkouri S; Melanson P; Melanson B; Oliva VL; Soulez G Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):1688-94. PubMed ID: 21601403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Endovascular aneurysm repair at 5 years: Does aneurysm diameter predict outcome? Zarins CK; Crabtree T; Bloch DA; Arko FR; Ouriel K; White RA J Vasc Surg; 2006 Nov; 44(5):920-29; discussion 929-31. PubMed ID: 17098519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Coupling bifurcated stent-grafts to overcome anatomic limitations of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Lee M; Lee DY; Kim MD; Lee MS; Park SI; Won JY; Choi D; Ko YG J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2012 Aug; 23(8):1065-9. PubMed ID: 22698969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Durability of abdominal aortic endograft with the Talent Unidoc stent graft in common practice: Core lab reanalysis from the TAURIS multicenter study. Cao P; De Rango P; Parlani G; Verzini F; J Vasc Surg; 2009 Apr; 49(4):859-65. PubMed ID: 19341881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Regarding "Abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter: a comparison of ultrasound measurements with those from standard and three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction". Dalainas I; Avgerinos ED J Vasc Surg; 2010 Jan; 51(1):287; author reply 287-8. PubMed ID: 20117528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Follow-up on Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using Three Dimensional Ultrasound: Volume Versus Diameter. Ghulam QM; Bredahl KK; Lönn L; Rouet L; Sillesen HH; Eiberg JP Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2017 Oct; 54(4):439-445. PubMed ID: 28765014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Diameter-related variations of geometrical, mechanical, and mass fraction data in the anterior portion of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Tong J; Cohnert T; Holzapfel GA Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2015 Mar; 49(3):262-70. PubMed ID: 25617258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Standardizing Methods of Reading CT Maximum Aortic Diameters Amongst Experts Reduces Variations and Discordance, Improving Accuracy. Perry JW; Schoenhagen P; Huang SSL; Kirksey L; Rowse JW; Smolock CJ; Lyden SP; Hardy DM; Caputo FJ Ann Vasc Surg; 2022 Feb; 79():264-272. PubMed ID: 34656714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Computed Tomography Postprocessing for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Lumen Recognition in Unenhanced Examinations. Cieri E; Simonte G; Costarelli D; Fiorucci B; Isernia G; Seracini M; Vinti G Ann Vasc Surg; 2019 Oct; 60():407-414. PubMed ID: 31200051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A case-matched validation study of anatomic severity grade score in predicting reinterventions after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Johnson PG; Chipman CR; Ahanchi SS; Kim JH; Dexter DJ; Panneton JM J Vasc Surg; 2013 Sep; 58(3):582-8. PubMed ID: 23769938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. An abdominal aortic aneurysm segmentation method: level set with region and statistical information. Zhuge F; Rubin GD; Sun S; Napel S Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1440-53. PubMed ID: 16752579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. What imaging studies are necessary for abdominal aortic endograft sizing? A prospective blinded study using conventional computed tomography, aortography, and three-dimensional computed tomography. Parker MV; O'Donnell SD; Chang AS; Johnson CA; Gillespie DL; Goff JM; Rasmussen TE; Rich NM J Vasc Surg; 2005 Feb; 41(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 15767998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of 64-row computed tomography abdominal aortic aneurysm neck measurements. Diehm N; Kickuth R; Gahl B; Do DD; Schmidli J; Rattunde H; Baumgartner I; Dick F J Vasc Surg; 2007 Feb; 45(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 17264000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Fully automatic volume segmentation of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm computed tomography images with deep learning approaches versus physician controlled manual segmentation. Caradu C; Spampinato B; Vrancianu AM; Bérard X; Ducasse E J Vasc Surg; 2021 Jul; 74(1):246-256.e6. PubMed ID: 33309556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Agreement between computed tomography and ultrasound on abdominal aortic aneurysms and implications on clinical decisions. Foo FJ; Hammond CJ; Goldstone AR; Abuhamdiah M; Rashid ST; West RM; Nicholson AA; Scott DJ Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2011 Nov; 42(5):608-14. PubMed ID: 21852165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Source of errors and accuracy of a two-dimensional/three-dimensional fusion road map for endovascular aneurysm repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Kauffmann C; Douane F; Therasse E; Lessard S; Elkouri S; Gilbert P; Beaudoin N; Pfister M; Blair JF; Soulez G J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):544-51. PubMed ID: 25724087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]