371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23727518)
1. Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a prospective randomized comparison of surgical morbidity.
Tappauf C; Schest E; Reif P; Lang U; Tamussino K; Schoell W
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 209(4):338.e1-8. PubMed ID: 23727518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetus delivery time in extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a randomized trial.
Yapca OE; Topdagi YE; Al RA
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Feb; 33(4):657-663. PubMed ID: 29996688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Closure versus non-closure of peritoneum at cesarean section--evaluation of pain. A randomized study.
Højberg KE; Aagaard J; Laursen H; Diab L; Secher NJ
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Aug; 77(7):741-5. PubMed ID: 9740522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ropivacaine continuous wound infusion versus epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
O'Neill P; Duarte F; Ribeiro I; Centeno MJ; Moreira J
Anesth Analg; 2012 Jan; 114(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 22025490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utility of the bladder flap at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Tuuli MG; Odibo AO; Fogertey P; Roehl K; Stamilio D; Macones GA
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Apr; 119(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 22395144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a retrospective study.
Ji C; Chen M; Qin Y
Postgrad Med; 2023 Jan; 135(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 36130848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Misgav-Ladach method of cesarean section: a step forward in operative technique in obstetrics.
Hudić I; Bujold E; Fatušić Z; Skokić F; Latifagić A; Kapidžić M; Fatušić J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov; 286(5):1141-6. PubMed ID: 22752598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparative evaluation of the Joel-Cohen cesarean section versus the transrectal incision].
Le Dû R; Bernardini M; Agostini A; Mazouni C; Shojai R; Blanc B; Gamerre M; Bretelle F
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2007 Sep; 36(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 17335999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intra-abdominal irrigation at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Viney R; Isaacs C; Chelmow D
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 119(6):1106-11. PubMed ID: 22617574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Closure vs non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section: evaluation of pain.
Atabekoğlu CS; Türkçüoğlu I; Duru B; Sönmezer M; Süer G; Uysalel A; Koç A; Söylemez F
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 May; 31(4):307-10. PubMed ID: 21534751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Caesarean section: closure or non-closure of peritoneum? A randomized trial of postoperative morbidity].
Huchon C; Raiffort C; Chis C; Messaoudi F; Jacquemot MC; Panel P
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 Oct; 33(10):745-9. PubMed ID: 16154376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective study of non-closure or closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery in 124 women: Impact of prior peritoneal closure at primary cesarean on the interval time between first cesarean section and the next pregnancy and significant adhesion at second cesarean.
Komoto Y; Shimoya K; Shimizu T; Kimura T; Hayashi S; Temma-Asano K; Kanagawa T; Fukuda H; Murata Y
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2006 Aug; 32(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 16882265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of closure versus non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean section: does it have any effect on postoperative vital signs? A prospective randomized study.
Kurek Eken M; Özkaya E; Tarhan T; İçöz Ş; Eroğlu Ş; Kahraman ŞT; Karateke A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Apr; 30(8):922-926. PubMed ID: 27187047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Postoperative analgesic requirements after subarachnoid or epidural anesthesia with ropivacaine 0.75% in cesarean section. A double-blind randomized trial.
Paraskeva A; Diamantis M; Petropoulos G; Siafaka I; Fassoulaki A
Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Sep; 28(9):1497-504. PubMed ID: 22937725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of uterine exteriorization and in situ repair during cesarean sections.
Gode F; Okyay RE; Saatli B; Ertugrul C; Guclu S; Altunyurt S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Jun; 285(6):1541-5. PubMed ID: 22205186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of closure versus nonclosure of peritoneum at cesarean section on adhesions: a prospective randomized study.
Kapustian V; Anteby EY; Gdalevich M; Shenhav S; Lavie O; Gemer O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jan; 206(1):56.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21924397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analgesic requirements and postoperative recovery after scheduled compared to unplanned cesarean delivery: a retrospective chart review.
Carvalho B; Coleman L; Saxena A; Fuller AJ; Riley ET
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2010 Jan; 19(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 19954964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A single preoperative dose of gabapentin does not improve postcesarean delivery pain management: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-finding trial.
Short J; Downey K; Bernstein P; Shah V; Carvalho JC
Anesth Analg; 2012 Dec; 115(6):1336-42. PubMed ID: 23011560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized controlled study of peritoneal closure at cesarean section.
Galaal KA; Krolikowski A
Saudi Med J; 2000 Aug; 21(8):759-61. PubMed ID: 11423890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extraperitoneal cesarean section: a surgical form of infection prophylaxis?
Wallace RL; Eglinton GS; Yonekura ML; Wallace TM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Jan; 148(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 6362417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
