These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23727883)

  • 1. Vision contingent auditory pitch aftereffects.
    Teramoto W; Kobayashi M; Hidaka S; Sugita Y
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Aug; 229(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 23727883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changing pitch of sounds alters perceived visual motion trajectory.
    Takeshima Y; Gyoba J
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(4):317-32. PubMed ID: 24319926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sound frequency and aural selectivity in sound-contingent visual motion aftereffect.
    Kobayashi M; Teramoto W; Hidaka S; Sugita Y
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e36803. PubMed ID: 22649500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sounds can alter the perceived direction of a moving visual object.
    Teramoto W; Hidaka S; Sugita Y; Sakamoto S; Gyoba J; Iwaya Y; Suzuki Y
    J Vis; 2012 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 22410584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory pitch glides influence time-to-contact judgements of visual stimuli.
    King C; Prime SL
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Aug; 237(8):1907-1917. PubMed ID: 31104086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual motion influences the contingent auditory motion aftereffect.
    Vroomen J; de Gelder B
    Psychol Sci; 2003 Jul; 14(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 12807410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sound-contingent visual motion aftereffect.
    Hidaka S; Teramoto W; Kobayashi M; Sugita Y
    BMC Neurosci; 2011 May; 12():44. PubMed ID: 21569617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of pitch-space correspondence on sound-induced visual motion perception.
    Hidaka S; Teramoto W; Keetels M; Vroomen J
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 231(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 24030519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alternation of sound location induces visual motion perception of a static object.
    Hidaka S; Manaka Y; Teramoto W; Sugita Y; Miyauchi R; Gyoba J; Suzuki Y; Iwaya Y
    PLoS One; 2009 Dec; 4(12):e8188. PubMed ID: 19997648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Change of temporal-order judgment of sounds during long-lasting exposure to large-field visual motion.
    Teramoto W; Watanabe H; Umemura H
    Perception; 2008; 37(11):1649-66. PubMed ID: 19189730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictability modulates motor-auditory interactions in self-triggered audio-visual apparent motion.
    Zvyagintsev M; Nikolaev AR; Mathiak KA; Menning H; Hertrich I; Mathiak K
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 189(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 18500638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory temporal modulation of the visual Ternus effect: the influence of time interval.
    Shi Z; Chen L; Müller HJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Jun; 203(4):723-35. PubMed ID: 20473749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Touch-contingent visual motion perception: tactile events drive visual motion perception.
    Teraoka R; Teramoto W
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):903-912. PubMed ID: 27915368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implicit auditory modulation on the temporal characteristics of perceptual alternation in visual competition.
    Takahashi K; Watanabe K
    J Vis; 2010 Apr; 10(4):11.1-13. PubMed ID: 20465331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Audiovisual short-term influences and aftereffects in motion: examination across three sets of directional pairings.
    Jain A; Sally SL; Papathomas TV
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):7.1-13. PubMed ID: 19146291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sounds move a static visual object.
    Teramoto W; Hidaka S; Sugita Y
    PLoS One; 2010 Aug; 5(8):e12255. PubMed ID: 20808861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of auditory and visual apparent motion presented individually and with crossmodal moving distractors.
    Strybel TZ; Vatakis A
    Perception; 2004; 33(9):1033-48. PubMed ID: 15560506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory modulation of visual apparent motion with short spatial and temporal intervals.
    Kafaligonul H; Stoner GR
    J Vis; 2010 Oct; 10(12):31. PubMed ID: 21047763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Natural, metaphoric, and linguistic auditory direction signals have distinct influences on visual motion processing.
    Sadaghiani S; Maier JX; Noppeney U
    J Neurosci; 2009 May; 29(20):6490-9. PubMed ID: 19458220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory capture of visual apparent motion, both laterally and looming.
    McBeath MK; Addie JD; Krynen RC
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():105-112. PubMed ID: 30602130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.