These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23728783)

  • 1. Views of genetics health professionals on the return of genomic results.
    Grove ME; Wolpert MN; Cho MK; Lee SS; Ormond KE
    J Genet Couns; 2014 Aug; 23(4):531-8. PubMed ID: 23728783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing.
    Yu JH; Harrell TM; Jamal SM; Tabor HK; Bamshad MJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2014 Jul; 95(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 24975944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prenatal whole exome sequencing: the views of clinicians, scientists, genetic counsellors and patient representatives.
    Quinlan-Jones E; Kilby MD; Greenfield S; Parker M; McMullan D; Hurles ME; Hillman SC
    Prenat Diagn; 2016 Oct; 36(10):935-941. PubMed ID: 27550507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetics professionals' perspectives on reporting incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing.
    Lohn Z; Adam S; Birch P; Townsend A; Friedman J
    Am J Med Genet A; 2013 Mar; 161A(3):542-9. PubMed ID: 23401068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding variations in secondary findings reporting practices across U.S. genome sequencing laboratories.
    Ackerman SL; Koenig BA
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 29131714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical geneticists' views on and experiences with unsolicited findings in next-generation sequencing: "A great technology creating new dilemmas".
    van der Schoot V; Damsté C; Yntema HG; Brunner HG; Oerlemans AJM
    J Genet Couns; 2023 Apr; 32(2):387-396. PubMed ID: 36366912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association of Researcher Characteristics with Views on Return of Incidental Findings from Genomic Research.
    Wynn J; Martinez J; Duong J; Zhang Y; Phelan J; Fyer A; Klitzman R; Appelbaum PS; Chung WK
    J Genet Couns; 2015 Oct; 24(5):833-41. PubMed ID: 25592144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adoptees' Pursuit of Genomic Testing to Fill Gaps in Family Health History and Reduce Healthcare Disparity.
    Casas KA
    Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2018; 8(2):131-135. PubMed ID: 30220696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perspectives of clinical genetics professionals toward genome sequencing and incidental findings: a survey study.
    Lemke AA; Bick D; Dimmock D; Simpson P; Veith R
    Clin Genet; 2013 Sep; 84(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 23163796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Expanded carrier screening in reproductive healthcare: perspectives from genetics professionals.
    Cho D; McGowan ML; Metcalfe J; Sharp RR
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Jun; 28(6):1725-30. PubMed ID: 23589535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "Not Tied Up Neatly with a Bow": Professionals' Challenging Cases in Informed Consent for Genomic Sequencing.
    Tomlinson AN; Skinner D; Perry DL; Scollon SR; Roche MI; Bernhardt BA
    J Genet Couns; 2016 Feb; 25(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 25911622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2397-406. PubMed ID: 12692171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Views of primary care providers regarding the return of genome sequencing incidental findings.
    Strong KA; Zusevics KL; Bick D; Veith R
    Clin Genet; 2014 Nov; 86(5):461-8. PubMed ID: 24673592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic Counselors' Experience with and Opinions on the Management of Newborn Screening Incidental Carrier Findings.
    Leppert K; Bisordi K; Nieto J; Maloney K; Guan Y; Dixon S; Egense A
    J Genet Couns; 2018 Dec; 27(6):1328-1340. PubMed ID: 29687313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploration of genetic health professional - laboratory specialist interactions in diagnostic genomic sequencing.
    Vears DF; Sénécal K; Borry P
    Eur J Med Genet; 2020 Mar; 63(3):103749. PubMed ID: 31472303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
    Middleton A; Morley KI; Bragin E; Firth HV; Hurles ME; Wright CF; Parker M;
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Jan; 24(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 25920556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "I want to know what's in Pandora's Box": comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing.
    Townsend A; Adam S; Birch PH; Lohn Z; Rousseau F; Friedman JM
    Am J Med Genet A; 2012 Oct; 158A(10):2519-25. PubMed ID: 22903777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic counselors' perceptions of uncertainty in pretest counseling for genomic sequencing: A qualitative study.
    Park J; Zayhowski K; Newson AJ; Ormond KE
    J Genet Couns; 2019 Apr; 28(2):292-303. PubMed ID: 30741463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stakeholders' opinions on the implementation of pediatric whole exome sequencing: implications for informed consent.
    Levenseller BL; Soucier DJ; Miller VA; Harris D; Conway L; Bernhardt BA
    J Genet Couns; 2014 Aug; 23(4):552-65. PubMed ID: 23846343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role and practice evolution for genetic counseling in the genomic era: The experience of Australian and UK genetics practitioners.
    Dwarte T; Barlow-Stewart K; O'Shea R; Dinger ME; Terrill B
    J Genet Couns; 2019 Apr; 28(2):378-387. PubMed ID: 30629777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.