BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23729132)

  • 1. Acceptability and attractiveness of intra- and extra-oral orthodontic appliances.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Karajeh MA
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2013; 24(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 23729132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attractiveness, acceptability, and value of orthodontic appliances.
    Rosvall MD; Fields HW; Ziuchkovski J; Rosenstiel SF; Johnston WM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Mar; 135(3):276.e1-12; discussion 276-7. PubMed ID: 19268820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment results in dental school orthodontic patients in 1983 and 1993.
    Firestone AR; Häsler RU; Ingervall B
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 10022180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of perceived orthodontic appliance attractiveness.
    Ziuchkovski JP; Fields HW; Johnston WM; Lindsey DT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4 Suppl):S68-78. PubMed ID: 18407023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthodontic appliance preferences of children and adolescents.
    Walton DK; Fields HW; Johnston WM; Rosenstiel SF; Firestone AR; Christensen JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):698.e1-12; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 21130314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objective assessment of compliance with intra- and extraoral removable appliances.
    Arreghini A; Trigila S; Lombardo L; Siciliani G
    Angle Orthod; 2017 Jan; 87(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 27508935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Efficacy of orthodontic treatment according to the Peer Assessment Rating index].
    Piskorski D
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():335-51. PubMed ID: 15552857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A study of young people's perceptions of their orthodontic need and their experience of orthodontic services.
    Gray M; Anderson R
    Prim Dent Care; 1998 Jul; 5(3):87-93. PubMed ID: 9759051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Social perceptions of adults wearing orthodontic appliances: a cross-sectional study.
    Jeremiah HG; Bister D; Newton JT
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Oct; 33(5):476-82. PubMed ID: 20651044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of metal and ceramic fixed orthodontic appliances on judgments of beauty and other face-related attributes.
    Fonseca LM; Araújo TM; Santos AR; Faber J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):203-6. PubMed ID: 24485735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orthodontists' views on indications for and timing of orthodontic treatment in Finnish public oral health care.
    Pietilä I; Pietilä T; Pirttiniemi P; Varrela J; Alanen P
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 17962314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dental esthetics, orthodontic treatment, and oral-health attitudes in young adults.
    Klages U; Bruckner A; Guld Y; Zentner A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):442-9. PubMed ID: 16214625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of compliance and completion of orthodontic treatment: are quality of life measures important?
    Mandall NA; Matthew S; Fox D; Wright J; Conboy FM; O'Brien KD
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 17971352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immigrant background and orthodontic treatment need. Quantitative and qualitative studies in Swedish adolescents.
    Josefsson E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (207):1-92. PubMed ID: 21299056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of general self-efficacy and the severity of malocclusion on acceptance of removable orthodontic appliances in 10- to 12-year-old patients.
    Naseri N; Baherimoghadam T; Bassagh N; Hamedani S; Bassagh E; Hashemi Z
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Nov; 20(1):344. PubMed ID: 33256680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-perception of malocclusion among north Jordanian school children.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Al-Nimri KS; Al-Khateeb SN
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Jun; 27(3):292-5. PubMed ID: 15947230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study of need and demand for orthodontic treatment in two contrasting National Health Service regions.
    Gravely JF
    Br J Orthod; 1990 Nov; 17(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 2285696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of economic restraints and reduced specialist resources on delivery and quality of orthodontic care.
    Josefsson E; Halling A
    Swed Dent J; 2000; 24(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 11140543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized controlled trial of self-perceived pain, discomfort, and impairment of jaw function in children undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed or removable appliances.
    Wiedel AP; Bondemark L
    Angle Orthod; 2016 Mar; 86(2):324-30. PubMed ID: 26185899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors influencing the outcome and duration of removable appliance treatment.
    John W; Kerr S; Buchanan IB; McNair FI; McColl JH
    Eur J Orthod; 1994 Jun; 16(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 8062858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.