These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23729236)

  • 1. Psychological distance and reaction time in a Stroop task.
    De Marchis G; Rivero Expósito Mdel P; Reales Avilés JM
    Cogn Process; 2013 Nov; 14(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 23729236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing stimulus-stimulus (semantic) conflict in the Stroop task using saccadic two-to-one color response mapping and preresponse pupillary measures.
    Hasshim N; Parris BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2601-10. PubMed ID: 26272367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention.
    Kinoshita S; Mills L; Norris D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1730-1742. PubMed ID: 29672118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; van der Meij R
    Brain Res; 2012 Apr; 1450():87-101. PubMed ID: 22424790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Social priming of dyslexia and reduction of the Stroop effect: what component of the Stroop effect is actually reduced?
    Augustinova M; Ferrand L
    Cognition; 2014 Mar; 130(3):442-54. PubMed ID: 24387881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Different types of semantic interference, same lapses of attention: Evidence from Stroop tasks.
    Scaltritti M; Job R; Sulpizio S
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jul; 50(5):898-910. PubMed ID: 35040025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Some further clarifications on age-related differences in Stroop interference.
    Augustinova M; Clarys D; Spatola N; Ferrand L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):767-774. PubMed ID: 29372512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response Time Distribution Analysis of Semantic and Response Interference in a Manual Response Stroop Task.
    Hasshim N; Downes M; Bate S; Parris BA
    Exp Psychol; 2019 May; 66(3):231-238. PubMed ID: 31266430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Potential impact of bifrontal transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on the semantic Stroop effect and its resting-state EEG correlates.
    Dondé C; Brevet-Aeby C; Poulet E; Mondino M; Brunelin J
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2019 Jun; 49(3):243-248. PubMed ID: 30930187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selective inhibition and naming performance in semantic blocking, picture-word interference, and color-word Stroop tasks.
    Shao Z; Roelofs A; Martin RC; Meyer AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1806-1820. PubMed ID: 26030631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Further investigation of distinct components of Stroop interference and of their reduction by short response-stimulus intervals.
    Augustinova M; Silvert L; Spatola N; Ferrand L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():54-62. PubMed ID: 28407872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The role of semantic attributes of the distractor word in the script type effect on the Stroop color-word interference task].
    Hayashi R
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1988 Apr; 59(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 3210456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A reach-to-touch investigation on the nature of reading in the Stroop task.
    Tillman G; Eidels A; Finkbeiner M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2547-2557. PubMed ID: 27549606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Picture-word interference is a Stroop effect: A theoretical analysis and new empirical findings.
    Starreveld PA; La Heij W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):721-733. PubMed ID: 27714665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Training reveals the sources of Stroop and Flanker interference effects.
    Chen A; Tang D; Chen X
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e76580. PubMed ID: 24146892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-letter coloring and spatial cuing do not eliminate or reduce a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.
    Augustinova M; Flaudias V; Ferrand L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Dec; 17(6):827-33. PubMed ID: 21169576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Common and specific loci of Stroop effects in vocal and manual tasks, revealed by event-related brain potentials and posthypnotic suggestions.
    Zahedi A; Abdel Rahman R; Stürmer B; Sommer W
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Sep; 148(9):1575-1594. PubMed ID: 30730196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 20192539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transitions between color categories mapped with a reverse Stroop task.
    Smithson HE; Khan SS; Sharpe LT; Stockman A
    Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):453-60. PubMed ID: 16961980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The semantic Stroop effect: An ex-Gaussian analysis.
    White D; Risko EF; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1576-1581. PubMed ID: 26907601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.