361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23729265)
1. Structure-based virtual screening for novel ligands.
Pitt WR; Calmiano MD; Kroeplien B; Taylor RD; Turner JP; King MA
Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1008():501-19. PubMed ID: 23729265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Molecular fields in ligand discovery.
Gane PJ; Chan AW
Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1008():479-99. PubMed ID: 23729264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Protein-ligand-based pharmacophores: generation and utility assessment in computational ligand profiling.
Meslamani J; Li J; Sutter J; Stevens A; Bertrand HO; Rognan D
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):943-55. PubMed ID: 22480372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploration of the structural requirements of HIV-protease inhibitors using pharmacophore, virtual screening and molecular docking approaches for lead identification.
Islam MA; Pillay TS
J Mol Graph Model; 2015 Mar; 56():20-30. PubMed ID: 25541527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of support vector machine to three-dimensional shape-based virtual screening using comprehensive three-dimensional molecular shape overlay with known inhibitors.
Sato T; Yuki H; Takaya D; Sasaki S; Tanaka A; Honma T
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):1015-26. PubMed ID: 22424085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Discovery of novel tubulin inhibitors via structure-based hierarchical virtual screening.
Cao R; Liu M; Yin M; Liu Q; Wang Y; Huang N
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2730-40. PubMed ID: 22992059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complementarity between in silico and biophysical screening approaches in fragment-based lead discovery against the A(2A) adenosine receptor.
Chen D; Ranganathan A; IJzerman AP; Siegal G; Carlsson J
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2701-14. PubMed ID: 23971943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Structure-based virtual screening of MT2 melatonin receptor: influence of template choice and structural refinement.
Pala D; Beuming T; Sherman W; Lodola A; Rivara S; Mor M
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Apr; 53(4):821-35. PubMed ID: 23541165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extensive consensus docking evaluation for ligand pose prediction and virtual screening studies.
Tuccinardi T; Poli G; Romboli V; Giordano A; Martinelli A
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2980-6. PubMed ID: 25211541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ligand aligning method for molecular docking: alignment of property-weighted vectors.
Joung JY; Nam KY; Cho KH; No KT
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):984-95. PubMed ID: 22471323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Structure-based and multiple potential three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (SB-MP-3D-QSAR) for inhibitor design.
Du QS; Gao J; Wei YT; Du LQ; Wang SQ; Huang RB
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):996-1004. PubMed ID: 22480344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In silico fragment-based drug discovery: setup and validation of a fragment-to-lead computational protocol using S4MPLE.
Hoffer L; Renaud JP; Horvath D
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Apr; 53(4):836-51. PubMed ID: 23537132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An extensive and diverse set of molecular overlays for the validation of pharmacophore programs.
Giangreco I; Cosgrove DA; Packer MJ
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Apr; 53(4):852-66. PubMed ID: 23565904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. From heptahelical bundle to hits from the Haystack: structure-based virtual screening for GPCR ligands.
Kooistra AJ; Roumen L; Leurs R; de Esch IJ; de Graaf C
Methods Enzymol; 2013; 522():279-336. PubMed ID: 23374191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. First pharmacophore model of CCR3 receptor antagonists and its homology model-assisted, stepwise virtual screening.
Jain V; Saravanan P; Arvind A; Mohan CG
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2011 May; 77(5):373-87. PubMed ID: 21284830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Molecular modeling of the 3D structure of 5-HT(1A)R: discovery of novel 5-HT(1A)R agonists via dynamic pharmacophore-based virtual screening.
Xu L; Zhou S; Yu K; Gao B; Jiang H; Zhen X; Fu W
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Dec; 53(12):3202-11. PubMed ID: 24245825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study on the use of docking and Bayesian categorization to predict ligand binding to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) subtypes.
Kombo DC; Bencherif M
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Dec; 53(12):3212-22. PubMed ID: 24328365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pharmacophore-based virtual screening to aid in the identification of unknown protein function.
Mallipeddi PL; Joshi M; Briggs JM
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2012 Dec; 80(6):828-42. PubMed ID: 22568756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.
Thompson DC; Humblet C; Joseph-McCarthy D
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
