BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23729494)

  • 1. Changes in indications and oncological outcomes of radical prostatectomy after 2000--data from 1268 Japanese patients treated with radical prostatectomy between 2000 and 2009.
    Mitsuzuka K; Koie T; Narita S; Kaiho Y; Yoneyama T; Tsuchiya N; Kakoi N; Kawamura S; Tochigi T; Ohyama C; Habuchi T; Yamaguchi T; Arai Y
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2013 Aug; 43(8):821-6. PubMed ID: 23729494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.
    Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Koie T; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Yoneyama T; Kakoi N; Kawamura S; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Ohyama C; Arai Y
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):914-20. PubMed ID: 23320782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term oncological outcome and risk stratification in men with high-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.
    Yamamoto S; Kawakami S; Yonese J; Fujii Y; Urakami S; Masuda H; Numao N; Ishikawa Y; Kohno A; Fukui I
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2012 Jun; 42(6):541-7. PubMed ID: 22457326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
    Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors.
    Jack GS; Cookson MS; Coffey CS; Vader V; Roberts RL; Chang SS; Smith JA; Shappell SB
    J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 12131301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
    Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does the tertiary Gleason pattern influence the PSA progression-free interval after retropubic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer?
    van Oort IM; Schout BM; Kiemeney LA; Hulsbergen CA; Witjes JA
    Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):572-6. PubMed ID: 16046051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reassessment of the risk factors for biochemical recurrence in D'Amico intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated using radical prostatectomy.
    Narita S; Mitsuzuka K; Tsuchiya N; Koie T; Kawamura S; Ohyama C; Tochigi T; Yamaguchi T; Arai Y; Habuchi T;
    Int J Urol; 2015 Nov; 22(11):1029-35. PubMed ID: 26290306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of prostate volume on tumor grade in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in the era of extended prostatic biopsies.
    Kassouf W; Nakanishi H; Ochiai A; Babaian KN; Troncoso P; Babaian RJ
    J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 17499289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: biochemical outcome.
    Kawamorita N; Saito S; Ishidoya S; Ito A; Saito H; Kato M; Arai Y
    Int J Urol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):733-8. PubMed ID: 19674167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Percentage of positive biopsy cores, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, pT and Gleason score as predictors of PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional outcome study in Japan.
    Yokomizo A; Murai M; Baba S; Ogawa O; Tsukamoto T; Niwakawa M; Tobisu K; Kinukawa N; Naito S
    BJU Int; 2006 Sep; 98(3):549-53. PubMed ID: 16925752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity of the CAPRA score to predict biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy. Results from a european multicenter survey of 1,296 patients.
    May M; Knoll N; Siegsmund M; Fahlenkamp D; Vogler H; Hoschke B; Gralla O
    J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1957-62; discussion 1962. PubMed ID: 17868719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship between serum prostate specific antigen level and tumor volume persists in the current era.
    Ochiai A; Troncoso P; Babaian RJ
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):903-6. PubMed ID: 17296372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in prostate cancer grade, stage, and location in radical prostatectomy specimens from United States and Japan.
    Takahashi H; Epstein JI; Wakui S; Yamamoto T; Furusato B; Zhang M
    Prostate; 2014 Feb; 74(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 24259155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Link BA; Nelson R; Josephson DY; Yoshida JS; Crocitto LE; Kawachi MH; Wilson TG
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):928-32. PubMed ID: 18635217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical and oncological outcomes in patients with preoperative PSA >20 ng/ml undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Zugor V; Witt JH; Heidenreich A; Porres D; Labanaris AP
    Anticancer Res; 2012 May; 32(5):2091-5. PubMed ID: 22593494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
    Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.