These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23730217)

  • 1. Rhythmic grouping biases constrain infant statistical learning.
    Hay JF; Saffran JR
    Infancy; 2012 Nov; 17(6):610-641. PubMed ID: 23730217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Exploration of Rhythmic Grouping of Speech Sequences by French- and German-Learning Infants.
    Abboub N; Boll-Avetisyan N; Bhatara A; Höhle B; Nazzi T
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():292. PubMed ID: 27378887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception of rhythmic grouping: testing the iambic/trochaic law.
    Hay JS; Diehl RL
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Jan; 69(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 17515221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning a Phonological Contrast Modulates the Auditory Grouping of Rhythm.
    Henny Yeung H; Bhatara A; Nazzi T
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 29923619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prosody outweighs statistics in 6-month-old German-learning infants' speech segmentation.
    Marimon M; Langus A; Höhle B
    Infancy; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38703064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-dimensional parsing of the acoustic stream explains the Iambic-Trochaic Law.
    Wagner M
    Psychol Rev; 2022 Mar; 129(2):268-288. PubMed ID: 34197177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The iambic-trochaic law without iambs or trochees: Parsing speech for grouping and prominence.
    Moghiseh E; Sonderegger M; Wagner M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Feb; 153(2):1108. PubMed ID: 36859141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic markers of prominence influence infants' and adults' segmentation of speech sequences.
    Bion RA; Benavides-Varela S; Nespor M
    Lang Speech; 2011 Mar; 54(Pt 1):123-40. PubMed ID: 21524015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Language dominance shapes non-linguistic rhythmic grouping in bilinguals.
    Molnar M; Carreiras M; Gervain J
    Cognition; 2016 Jul; 152():150-159. PubMed ID: 27062227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When cues collide: use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants.
    Thiessen ED; Saffran JR
    Dev Psychol; 2003 Jul; 39(4):706-16. PubMed ID: 12859124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Infant-directed speech reduces English-learning infants' preference for trochaic words.
    Wang Y; Lee CS; Houston DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Dec; 140(6):4101. PubMed ID: 28040035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Native language affects rhythmic grouping of speech.
    Bhatara A; Boll-Avetisyan N; Unger A; Nazzi T; Höhle B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3828-43. PubMed ID: 24180792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One language or two? Navigating cross-language conflict in statistical word segmentation.
    Antovich DM; Graf Estes K
    Dev Sci; 2020 Nov; 23(6):e12960. PubMed ID: 32145042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experience-dependent emergence of a grouping bias.
    Toro JM; Nespor M
    Biol Lett; 2015 Sep; 11(9):20150374. PubMed ID: 26562933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Infants show systematic rhythmic motor responses while listening to rhythmic speech.
    Boll-Avetisyan N; Shandala A; Langus A
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1370007. PubMed ID: 38952821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Domain-general mechanisms for speech segmentation: The role of duration information in language learning.
    Frost RL; Monaghan P; Tatsumi T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):466-476. PubMed ID: 27893268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Language specific prosodic preferences during the first half year of life: evidence from German and French infants.
    Höhle B; Bijeljac-Babic R; Herold B; Weissenborn J; Nazzi T
    Infant Behav Dev; 2009 Jun; 32(3):262-74. PubMed ID: 19427039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Words in a sea of sounds: the output of infant statistical learning.
    Saffran JR
    Cognition; 2001 Sep; 81(2):149-69. PubMed ID: 11376640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Infants' abilities to segment word forms from spectrally degraded speech in the first year of life.
    de la Cruz-Pavía I; Hegde M; Cabrera L; Nazzi T
    Dev Sci; 2024 Jun; ():e13533. PubMed ID: 38853379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rhythm on Your Lips.
    Peña M; Langus A; Gutiérrez C; Huepe-Artigas D; Nespor M
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1708. PubMed ID: 27877144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.