These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23730293)

  • 1. Syntactic computations in the language network: characterizing dynamic network properties using representational similarity analysis.
    Tyler LK; Cheung TP; Devereux BJ; Clarke A
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():271. PubMed ID: 23730293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retrieval and unification of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an FMRI study using word-category ambiguity.
    Snijders TM; Vosse T; Kempen G; Van Berkum JJ; Petersson KM; Hagoort P
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Jul; 19(7):1493-503. PubMed ID: 19001084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulating the brain's language network: syntactic ambiguity resolution after TMS to the inferior frontal gyrus and middle temporal gyrus.
    Acheson DJ; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Oct; 25(10):1664-77. PubMed ID: 23767923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Left inferior frontal cortex and syntax: function, structure and behaviour in patients with left hemisphere damage.
    Tyler LK; Marslen-Wilson WD; Randall B; Wright P; Devereux BJ; Zhuang J; Papoutsi M; Stamatakis EA
    Brain; 2011 Feb; 134(Pt 2):415-31. PubMed ID: 21278407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Context-dependent lexical ambiguity resolution: MEG evidence for the time-course of activity in left inferior frontal gyrus and posterior middle temporal gyrus.
    Mollo G; Jefferies E; Cornelissen P; Gennari SP
    Brain Lang; 2018; 177-178():23-36. PubMed ID: 29421269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dissociating frontotemporal contributions to semantic ambiguity resolution in spoken sentences.
    Rodd JM; Johnsrude IS; Davis MH
    Cereb Cortex; 2012 Aug; 22(8):1761-73. PubMed ID: 21968566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The cortical dynamics in building syntactic structures of sentences: an MEG study in a minimal-pair paradigm.
    Iijima K; Fukui N; Sakai KL
    Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(4):1387-96. PubMed ID: 19041723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Roles of frontal and temporal regions in reinterpreting semantically ambiguous sentences.
    Vitello S; Warren JE; Devlin JT; Rodd JM
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():530. PubMed ID: 25120445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of representational distance between meanings on the neural correlates of semantic ambiguity.
    Grindrod CM; Garnett EO; Malyutina S; den Ouden DB
    Brain Lang; 2014 Dec; 139():23-35. PubMed ID: 25463814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lists with and without Syntax: A New Approach to Measuring the Neural Processing of Syntax.
    Law R; Pylkkänen L
    J Neurosci; 2021 Mar; 41(10):2186-2196. PubMed ID: 33500276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An fMRI study investigating effects of conceptually related sentences on the perception of degraded speech.
    Guediche S; Reilly M; Santiago C; Laurent P; Blumstein SE
    Cortex; 2016 Jun; 79():57-74. PubMed ID: 27100909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phonological and syntactic competition effects in spoken word recognition: evidence from corpus-based statistics.
    Zhuang J; Devereux BJ
    Lang Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 32(2):221-235. PubMed ID: 28164141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of LIFG-based executive control in sentence comprehension.
    Vuong LC; Martin RC
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2015; 32(5):243-65. PubMed ID: 26216232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lack of selectivity for syntax relative to word meanings throughout the language network.
    Fedorenko E; Blank IA; Siegelman M; Mineroff Z
    Cognition; 2020 Oct; 203():104348. PubMed ID: 32569894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Left inferior frontal activations depending on the canonicity determined by the argument structures of ditransitive sentences: an MEG study.
    Inubushi T; Iijima K; Koizumi M; Sakai KL
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e37192. PubMed ID: 22629366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MEG study on neural activities associated with syntactic and semantic violations in spoken Korean sentences.
    Kwon H; Kuriki S; Kim JM; Lee YH; Kim K; Nam K
    Neurosci Res; 2005 Apr; 51(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 15740798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrieval cues and syntactic ambiguity resolution: Speed-accuracy tradeoff evidence.
    Martin AE; McElree B
    Lang Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 33(6):769-783. PubMed ID: 31131287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Localising semantic and syntactic processing in spoken and written language comprehension: an Activation Likelihood Estimation meta-analysis.
    Rodd JM; Vitello S; Woollams AM; Adank P
    Brain Lang; 2015 Feb; 141():89-102. PubMed ID: 25576690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MEG evidence that the LIFG effect of object extraction requires similarity-based interference.
    Leiken K; Pylkkänen L
    Lang Cogn Process; 2014 Apr; 29(3):381-389. PubMed ID: 24610968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural aspects of sentence comprehension: syntactic complexity, reversibility, and reanalysis.
    Meltzer JA; McArdle JJ; Schafer RJ; Braun AR
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Aug; 20(8):1853-64. PubMed ID: 19920058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.