122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23731444)
1. Use of dual X-ray absorptiometry to measure body mass during short- to medium-term trials of nutrition and exercise interventions.
Marinangeli CP; Kassis AN
Nutr Rev; 2013 Jun; 71(6):332-42. PubMed ID: 23731444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) by comparison with chemical analysis of dogs and cats.
Speakman JR; Booles D; Butterwick R
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Mar; 25(3):439-47. PubMed ID: 11319644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Body composition by DXA: tried and true?
Kohrt WM
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1995 Oct; 27(10):1349-53. PubMed ID: 8531604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Body composition in the elderly: reference values and bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy to predict total body skeletal muscle mass.
Tengvall M; Ellegård L; Malmros V; Bosaeus N; Lissner L; Bosaeus I
Clin Nutr; 2009 Feb; 28(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19010572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Body composition analysis by dual X-ray absorptiometry: in vivo and in vitro comparison of three different fan-beam instruments.
Aasen G; Fagertun H; Halse J
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2006; 66(8):659-66. PubMed ID: 17101558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone mineral and body composition measurements: cross-calibration of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.
Ellis KJ; Shypailo RJ
J Bone Miner Res; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1613-8. PubMed ID: 9783550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A validation study of body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive and HIV-negative Hispanic men and women.
Forrester JE; Sheehan HM; Joffe TH
J Am Diet Assoc; 2008 Mar; 108(3):534-8. PubMed ID: 18313436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity of segmental multiple-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis to estimate body composition of adults across a range of body mass indexes.
Shafer KJ; Siders WA; Johnson LK; Lukaski HC
Nutrition; 2009 Jan; 25(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18723322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of fan beam dual energy x ray absorptiometry for body composition assessment in adults aged 18-45 years.
Norcross J; Van Loan MD
Br J Sports Med; 2004 Aug; 38(4):472-6. PubMed ID: 15273189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the effectiveness of 2 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers with that of total body water and computed tomography in assessing changes in body composition during weight change.
Tylavsky FA; Lohman TG; Dockrell M; Lang T; Schoeller DA; Wan JY; Fuerst T; Cauley JA; Nevitt M; Harris TB
Am J Clin Nutr; 2003 Feb; 77(2):356-63. PubMed ID: 12540394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of fan beam dual energy x-ray absorptiometry to measure body composition of piglets.
Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
J Nutr; 2002 Jun; 132(6):1380-3. PubMed ID: 12042462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The intra- and inter-instrument reliability of DXA based on ex vivo soft tissue measurements.
Guo Y; Franks PW; Brookshire T; Antonio Tataranni P
Obes Res; 2004 Dec; 12(12):1925-9. PubMed ID: 15687392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of indexing resting metabolic rate against fat-free mass determined by different body composition models.
LaForgia J; van der Ploeg GE; Withers RT; Gunn SM; Brooks AG; Chatterton BE
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2004 Aug; 58(8):1132-41. PubMed ID: 15054426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers and other techniques used for whole-body soft tissue measurements.
Tothill P; Avenell A; Love J; Reid DM
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1994 Nov; 48(11):781-94. PubMed ID: 7859696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Agreement of bioelectrical impedance with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and MRI to estimate changes in body fat, skeletal muscle and visceral fat during a 12-month weight loss intervention.
Pietiläinen KH; Kaye S; Karmi A; Suojanen L; Rissanen A; Virtanen KA
Br J Nutr; 2013 May; 109(10):1910-6. PubMed ID: 22935366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pencil-beam versus fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry comparisons across four systems: appendicular lean soft tissue.
Ioannidou E; Padilla J; Wang J; Heymsfield SB; Thornton JC; Horlick M; Gallagher D; Pierson RN
Acta Diabetol; 2003 Oct; 40 Suppl 1():S83-5. PubMed ID: 14618441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimates of percentage body fat in young adolescents: a comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and air displacement plethysmography.
Radley D; Gately PJ; Cooke CB; Carroll S; Oldroyd B; Truscott JG
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2003 Nov; 57(11):1402-10. PubMed ID: 14576753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing body composition among 3- to 8-year-old children: anthropometry, BIA, and DXA.
Eisenmann JC; Heelan KA; Welk GJ
Obes Res; 2004 Oct; 12(10):1633-40. PubMed ID: 15536227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of body composition measurements obtained by two fan-beam DXA instruments.
Sakai Y; Ito H; Meno T; Numata M; Jingu S
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 16785080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Body composition assessment in adults with cystic fibrosis: comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with skinfolds and bioelectrical impedance analysis.
King S; Wilson J; Kotsimbos T; Bailey M; Nyulasi I
Nutrition; 2005; 21(11-12):1087-94. PubMed ID: 16183254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
