These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23731444)

  • 41. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: fat estimation errors due to variation in soft tissue hydration.
    Pietrobelli A; Wang Z; Formica C; Heymsfield SB
    Am J Physiol; 1998 May; 274(5):E808-16. PubMed ID: 9612238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. DXA body composition: theory and practice.
    Kelly TL; Berger N; Richardson TL
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1998; 49(5-6):511-3. PubMed ID: 9569530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of a new set of calibration standards for the measurement of fat content via DPA and DXA.
    Goodsitt MM
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 1620056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Manipulation of Muscle Creatine and Glycogen Changes Dual X-ray Absorptiometry Estimates of Body Composition.
    Bone JL; Ross ML; Tomcik KA; Jeacocke NA; Hopkins WG; Burke LM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 May; 49(5):1029-1035. PubMed ID: 28410328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition.
    Plank LD
    Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care; 2005 May; 8(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 15809534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Methodology review: using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for the assessment of body composition in athletes and active people.
    Nana A; Slater GJ; Stewart AD; Burke LM
    Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab; 2015 Apr; 25(2):198-215. PubMed ID: 25029265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effect of hydration status on the measurement of lean tissue mass by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Toomey CM; McCormack WG; Jakeman P
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2017 Mar; 117(3):567-574. PubMed ID: 28204901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition: differences between devices and comparison with reference methods.
    Genton L; Hans D; Kyle UG; Pichard C
    Nutrition; 2002 Jan; 18(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 11827768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Epidemiology of bone and joint disease - the present and future - . Diagnosis of sarcopenia : techniques for assessing muscle mass].
    Sone T
    Clin Calcium; 2014 May; 24(5):727-32. PubMed ID: 24769684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Assessing body composition in taller or broader individuals using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: a systematic review.
    Silva AM; Heymsfield SB; Sardinha LB
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2013 Oct; 67(10):1012-21. PubMed ID: 23942178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. DXA body composition properties: inherent in the physics or specific to scanner type?
    Nord RH
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1998; 49(5-6):517-8. PubMed ID: 9606081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Quality control of DXA instruments in multicenter trials.
    Faulkner KG; McClung MR
    Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(4):218-27. PubMed ID: 7492859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of two phantoms for body composition with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Diessel E; Shepherd JA; Fuerst T; Gonzalez M; Genant HK; Carew B; Looker A
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2000 May; 904():107-10. PubMed ID: 10865719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in early life.
    Lapillonne A; Braillon PM; Delmas PD; Salle BL
    Horm Res; 1997; 48 Suppl 1():43-9. PubMed ID: 9161871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Scanner-induced variability and quality assurance in longitudinal dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements.
    Sievänen H; Oja P; Vuori I
    Med Phys; 1994 Nov; 21(11):1795-805. PubMed ID: 7891642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Body composition by DXA.
    Shepherd JA; Ng BK; Sommer MJ; Heymsfield SB
    Bone; 2017 Nov; 104():101-105. PubMed ID: 28625918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Validation of estimates of lean tissue mass made by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Humphries IR; Hua V; Ban L; Gaskin KJ; Howman-Giles R
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2000 May; 904():104-6. PubMed ID: 10865718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Measurement of changes in soft tissue mass and fat mass with weight change: pencil- versus fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Health ABC Study.
    Tylavsky FA; Fuerst T; Nevitt M; Dockrell M; Wan JY; Cauley J; Harris T
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2000 May; 904():94-7. PubMed ID: 10865715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. In search of a practical tool to assess regional body composition.
    Lukaski HC
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2008 Oct; 88(4):875-6. PubMed ID: 18842770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [METHODS OF EVALUATION OF MUSCLE MASS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS].
    Moreira OC; de Oliveira CE; Candia-Luján R; Romero-Pérez EM; de Paz Fernandez JA
    Nutr Hosp; 2015 Sep; 32(3):977-85. PubMed ID: 26319809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.