These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23731719)

  • 21. Modeling biologic soft tissues for haptic feedback with an hybrid multiresolution method.
    Frisoli A; Borelli L; Bergamasco M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 111():145-8. PubMed ID: 15718716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fetal head moulding: finite element analysis of a fetal skull subjected to uterine pressures during the first stage of labour.
    Lapeer RJ; Prager RW
    J Biomech; 2001 Sep; 34(9):1125-33. PubMed ID: 11506783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A pervasive visual-haptic framework for virtual delivery training.
    Abate AF; Acampora G; Loia V; Ricciardi S; Vasilakos AV
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2010 Mar; 14(2):326-34. PubMed ID: 20659831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A biomechanical analysis on the impact of episiotomy during childbirth.
    Oliveira DA; Parente MP; Calvo B; Mascarenhas T; Jorge RM
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2016 Dec; 15(6):1523-1534. PubMed ID: 27002616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An intrauterine pressure generator for educational simulation of labour and delivery.
    Bastos LF; Lobo MF; van Meurs WL; Ayres-de-Campos D
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Sep; 32(7):740-5. PubMed ID: 20494606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Shell finite element model for interactive foetal head deformation during childbirth.
    Bailet M; Zara F; Promayon E
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2013; 16 Suppl 1():312-4. PubMed ID: 23923955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Prevention of human birth trauma I. Computer-assisted simulation of delivery using magnetic resonance tomography and finite element analysis].
    Wischnik A; Nalepa E; Lehmann KJ; Wentz KU; Georgi M; Melchert F
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1993 Jan; 53(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 8440456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The prevention of mechanical birth trauma by means of computer aided simulation of delivery by means of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging and finite element analysis.
    Melchert F; Wischnik A; Nalepa E
    J Obstet Gynaecol (Tokyo 1995); 1995 Apr; 21(2):195-207. PubMed ID: 8556581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modeling isotropic organs using beam models for the haptic simulation of blunt dissections.
    Dalmiya V; Ramirez G; Devarajan V
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 125():100-5. PubMed ID: 17377243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of the individual uterine contraction on fetal head descent and cervical dilatation during the active stage of labor.
    Luria O; Jaffa A; Farine D; Hassan S; Lysikiewicz A; Kees S; Barnea O
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 May; 144 Suppl 1():S101-7. PubMed ID: 19278773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Simulation of an instrumental childbirth for the training of the forceps extraction: control algorithm and evaluation.
    Moreau R; Pham MT; Brun X; Redarce T; Dupuis O
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2011 May; 15(3):364-72. PubMed ID: 21257384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A new kind of training for obstetric residents: simulator training.
    Moreau R; Jardin A; Pham MT; Redarce T; Olaby O; Dupuis O
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():4416-9. PubMed ID: 17946629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of forceps use in obstetrics during a simulated childbirth.
    Moreau R; Pham MT; Brun X; Redarce T; Dupuis O
    Int J Med Robot; 2008 Dec; 4(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 19006201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Detection and modelling of contacts in explicit finite-element simulation of soft tissue biomechanics.
    Johnsen SF; Taylor ZA; Han L; Hu Y; Clarkson MJ; Hawkes DJ; Ourselin S
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1873-91. PubMed ID: 25559760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantity and distribution of levator ani stretch during simulated vaginal childbirth.
    Hoyte L; Damaser MS; Warfield SK; Chukkapalli G; Majumdar A; Choi DJ; Trivedi A; Krysl P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 199(2):198.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18513684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biomechanical analyses of the efficacy of patterns of maternal effort on second-stage progress.
    Lien KC; DeLancey JOL; Ashton-Miller JA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 113(4):873-880. PubMed ID: 19305333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Using intercostal muscle EMG to quantify maternal expulsive efforts during vaginal delivery: a pilot study.
    Demaria F; Porcher R; Ismael SS; Amarenco G; Fritel X; Madelenat P; Benifla JL
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2004; 23(7):675-8; discussion 679. PubMed ID: 15382195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Anisotropic effects of the levator ani muscle during childbirth.
    Li X; Kruger JA; Nash MP; Nielsen PM
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2011 Jul; 10(4):485-94. PubMed ID: 20734100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biomechanical trade-offs in the pelvic floor constrain the evolution of the human birth canal.
    Stansfield E; Kumar K; Mitteroecker P; Grunstra NDS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Apr; 118(16):. PubMed ID: 33853947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rigid-bar loading on pregnant uterus and development of pregnant abdominal response corridor based on finite element biomechanical model.
    Irannejad Parizi M; Ahmadian MT; Mohammadi H
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Jan; 36(1):e3284. PubMed ID: 31733133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.