These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

637 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23731962)

  • 41. Carbon footprint of premium quality export bananas: case study in Ecuador, the world's largest exporter.
    Iriarte A; Almeida MG; Villalobos P
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 472():1082-8. PubMed ID: 24361571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The carbon footprints of home and in-center peritoneal dialysis in China.
    Chen M; Zhou R; Du C; Meng F; Wang Y; Wu L; Wang F; Xu Y; Yang X
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2017 Feb; 49(2):337-343. PubMed ID: 27848064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Research on the changing trend of the carbon footprint of residents' consumption in Beijing.
    Fan Z; Lei Y; Wu S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Feb; 26(4):4078-4090. PubMed ID: 30556122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions for an ethanol production process based on blue-green algae.
    Luo D; Hu Z; Choi DG; Thomas VM; Realff MJ; Chance RR
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Nov; 44(22):8670-7. PubMed ID: 20968295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The green operating room: simple changes to reduce cost and our carbon footprint.
    Wormer BA; Augenstein VA; Carpenter CL; Burton PV; Yokeley WT; Prabhu AS; Harris B; Norton S; Klima DA; Lincourt AE; Heniford BT
    Am Surg; 2013 Jul; 79(7):666-71. PubMed ID: 23815997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Improving the policy application of footprint indicators to support Europe's transition to a one planet economy: the development of the EUREAPA tool.
    Roelich K; Owen A; Thompson D; Dawkins E; West C
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 May; 481():662-7. PubMed ID: 24238813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Quantifying benefits of resource recovery from sanitation provision in a developing world setting.
    Cornejo PK; Zhang Q; Mihelcic JR
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Dec; 131():7-15. PubMed ID: 24140482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Carbon footprint of a laser unit: a study of two centres in the UK.
    Maheshwari K; Epanomeritakis IE; Hills S; Hindocha S
    Lasers Med Sci; 2024 May; 39(1):134. PubMed ID: 38771416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Options for achieving a 50% cut in industrial carbon emissions by 2050.
    Allwood JM; Cullen JM; Milford RL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Mar; 44(6):1888-94. PubMed ID: 20121181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Life cycle carbon footprint of shale gas: review of evidence and implications.
    Weber CL; Clavin C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jun; 46(11):5688-95. PubMed ID: 22545623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Carbon footprinting of emergency medical services systems: a proof-of-concept study.
    Blanchard I; Brown LH
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2009; 13(4):546-9. PubMed ID: 19731171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Carbon footprint of Breton pâté production: a case study.
    Teixeira R; Himeno A; Gustavus L
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Oct; 9(4):645-51. PubMed ID: 23801646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Quantifying carbon footprint reduction opportunities for U.S. households and communities.
    Jones CM; Kammen DM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 May; 45(9):4088-95. PubMed ID: 21449584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The carbon footprint of dietary guidelines around the world: a seven country modeling study.
    Kovacs B; Miller L; Heller MC; Rose D
    Nutr J; 2021 Mar; 20(1):15. PubMed ID: 33648497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Land-use and alternative bioenergy pathways for waste biomass.
    Campbell JE; Block E
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Nov; 44(22):8665-9. PubMed ID: 20883033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Including carbon emissions from deforestation in the carbon footprint of Brazilian beef.
    Cederberg C; Persson UM; Neovius K; Molander S; Clift R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(5):1773-9. PubMed ID: 21280649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Challenges in carbon footprint evaluations of state-of-the-art municipal wastewater resource recovery facilities.
    Faragò M; Damgaard A; Rebsdorf M; Nielsen PH; Rygaard M
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Oct; 320():115715. PubMed ID: 35952558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems.
    Stackhouse-Lawson KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4641-55. PubMed ID: 22952361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Convergence in CO
    Solarin SA
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Feb; 26(6):6167-6181. PubMed ID: 30617875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Steam sterilisation's energy and water footprint.
    McGain F; Moore G; Black J
    Aust Health Rev; 2017 Mar; 41(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 27075773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.