767 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23731996)
1. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial.
Scott RT; Upham KM; Forman EJ; Hong KH; Scott KL; Taylor D; Tao X; Treff NR
Fertil Steril; 2013 Sep; 100(3):697-703. PubMed ID: 23731996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial.
Scott RT; Upham KM; Forman EJ; Zhao T; Treff NR
Fertil Steril; 2013 Sep; 100(3):624-30. PubMed ID: 23773313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts.
Capalbo A; Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Elliott T; Wright G; Nagy ZP; Ubaldi FM
Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1173-81. PubMed ID: 24578475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study.
Scott RT; Ferry K; Su J; Tao X; Scott K; Treff NR
Fertil Steril; 2012 Apr; 97(4):870-5. PubMed ID: 22305103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comprehensive chromosome screening alters traditional morphology-based embryo selection: a prospective study of 100 consecutive cycles of planned fresh euploid blastocyst transfer.
Forman EJ; Upham KM; Cheng M; Zhao T; Hong KH; Treff NR; Scott RT
Fertil Steril; 2013 Sep; 100(3):718-24. PubMed ID: 23725804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of blastocyst biopsy and comprehensive chromosome screening technology on preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Dahdouh EM; Balayla J; García-Velasco JA
Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Mar; 30(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 25599824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Blastocyst euploidy and implantation rates in a young (<35 years) and old (≥35 years) presumed fertile and infertile patient population.
Taylor TH; Patrick JL; Gitlin SA; Crain JL; Wilson JM; Griffin DK
Fertil Steril; 2014 Nov; 102(5):1318-23. PubMed ID: 25154676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical application of comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage.
Schoolcraft WB; Fragouli E; Stevens J; Munne S; Katz-Jaffe MG; Wells D
Fertil Steril; 2010 Oct; 94(5):1700-6. PubMed ID: 19939370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-analysis.
Dahdouh EM; Balayla J; García-Velasco JA
Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1503-12. PubMed ID: 26385405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comprehensive chromosome screening of polar bodies and blastocysts from couples experiencing repeated implantation failure.
Fragouli E; Katz-Jaffe M; Alfarawati S; Stevens J; Colls P; Goodall NN; Tormasi S; Gutierrez-Mateo C; Prates R; Schoolcraft WB; Munne S; Wells D
Fertil Steril; 2010 Aug; 94(3):875-87. PubMed ID: 19540479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and validation of an accurate quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction-based assay for human blastocyst comprehensive chromosomal aneuploidy screening.
Treff NR; Tao X; Ferry KM; Su J; Taylor D; Scott RT
Fertil Steril; 2012 Apr; 97(4):819-24. PubMed ID: 22342859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Embryo selection versus natural selection: how do outcomes of comprehensive chromosome screening of blastocysts compare with the analysis of products of conception from early pregnancy loss (dilation and curettage) among an assisted reproductive technology population?
Rodriguez-Purata J; Lee J; Whitehouse M; Moschini RM; Knopman J; Duke M; Sandler B; Copperman A
Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1460-66.e1-12. PubMed ID: 26361205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
Forman EJ; Hong KH; Ferry KM; Tao X; Taylor D; Levy B; Treff NR; Scott RT
Fertil Steril; 2013 Jul; 100(1):100-7.e1. PubMed ID: 23548942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diminished effect of maternal age on implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis with array comparative genomic hybridization.
Harton GL; Munné S; Surrey M; Grifo J; Kaplan B; McCulloh DH; Griffin DK; Wells D;
Fertil Steril; 2013 Dec; 100(6):1695-703. PubMed ID: 24034939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preimplantation genetic screening: who benefits?
Kang HJ; Melnick AP; Stewart JD; Xu K; Rosenwaks Z
Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):597-602. PubMed ID: 27143516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Routine use of next-generation sequencing for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of blastomeres obtained from embryos on day 3 in fresh in vitro fertilization cycles.
Łukaszuk K; Pukszta S; Wells D; Cybulska C; Liss J; Płóciennik Ł; Kuczyński W; Zabielska J
Fertil Steril; 2015 Apr; 103(4):1031-6. PubMed ID: 25624194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of sperm morphology on preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles outcome.
Dubey A; Dayal MB; Frankfurter D; Balazy P; Peak D; Gindoff PR
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jun; 89(6):1665-9. PubMed ID: 17727848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of blastocysts biopsied and vitrified once versus those cryopreserved twice for euploid blastocyst transfer.
Taylor TH; Patrick JL; Gitlin SA; Michael Wilson J; Crain JL; Griffin DK
Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Jul; 29(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 24794643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consistent and reproducible outcomes of blastocyst biopsy and aneuploidy screening across different biopsy practitioners: a multicentre study involving 2586 embryo biopsies.
Capalbo A; Ubaldi FM; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Patassini C; Dusi L; Sanges F; Buffo L; Venturella R; Rienzi L
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):199-208. PubMed ID: 26637492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pregnancy outcomes following 24-chromosome preimplantation genetic diagnosis in couples with balanced reciprocal or Robertsonian translocations.
Idowu D; Merrion K; Wemmer N; Mash JG; Pettersen B; Kijacic D; Lathi RB
Fertil Steril; 2015 Apr; 103(4):1037-42. PubMed ID: 25712573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
