These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23735264)

  • 1. An advance letter did not increase the response rates in a telephone survey: a randomized trial.
    Carey RN; Reid A; Driscoll TR; Glass DC; Benke G; Fritschi L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 66(12):1417-21. PubMed ID: 23735264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Increasing response rates in telephone surveys: a randomized trial.
    Smith W; Chey T; Jalaludin B; Salkeld G; Capon T
    J Public Health Med; 1995 Mar; 17(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 7786565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating telephone follow-up of a mail survey of community pharmacies.
    Westrick SC; Mount JK
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Jun; 3(2):160-82. PubMed ID: 17561218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate.
    Byrne CM; Harrison JD; Young JM; Selby WS; Solomon MJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 60(12):1312-4. PubMed ID: 17998087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. To send or not to send: weighing the costs and benefits of mailing an advance letter to participants before a telephone survey.
    Schell C; Godinho A; Kushnir V; Cunningham JA
    BMC Res Notes; 2018 Nov; 11(1):813. PubMed ID: 30442187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of telephone prompts when surveying general practitioners: a randomised trial.
    Osborn M; Ward J; Boyle C
    Aust Fam Physician; 1996 Jan; Suppl 1():S41-3. PubMed ID: 9479799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Postal surveys of physicians gave superior response rates over telephone interviews in a randomized trial.
    Hocking JS; Lim MS; Read T; Hellard M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 May; 59(5):521-4. PubMed ID: 16632141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of an introductory letter on response rates to a teen/parent telephone health survey.
    Woodruff SI; Mayer JA; Clapp E
    Eval Rev; 2006 Dec; 30(6):817-23. PubMed ID: 17093110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increasing response to a postal survey of sedentary patients - a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN45665423].
    Harrison RA; Cock D
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Nov; 4(1):31. PubMed ID: 15537429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pre-Survey Text Messages (SMS) Improve Participation Rate in an Australian Mobile Telephone Survey: An Experimental Study.
    Dal Grande E; Chittleborough CR; Campostrini S; Dollard M; Taylor AW
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0150231. PubMed ID: 26919558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prenotification had no additional effect on the response rate and survey quality: a randomized trial.
    Xie Y; Ho SC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 66(12):1422-6. PubMed ID: 23742789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strategies for achieving a high response rate in a home interview survey.
    Kiezebrink K; Crombie IK; Irvine L; Swanson V; Power K; Wrieden WL; Slane PW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Jun; 9():46. PubMed ID: 19566931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Remote Collection of Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Outpatient Hand Surgery: A Randomized Trial of Telephone, Mail, and E-Mail.
    Schwartzenberger J; Presson A; Lyle A; O'Farrell A; Tyser AR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2017 Sep; 42(9):693-699. PubMed ID: 28600107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of survey instrument on participation in a follow-up study: a randomization study of a mailed questionnaire versus a computer-assisted telephone interview.
    Rocheleau CM; Romitti PA; Sherlock SH; Sanderson WT; Bell EM; Druschel C
    BMC Public Health; 2012 Jul; 12():579. PubMed ID: 22849754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictors of response rates to a long term follow-up mail out survey.
    Koloski NA; Jones M; Eslick G; Talley NJ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e79179. PubMed ID: 24223902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Introductory postcards: do they increase response rate in a telephone survey of older persons?
    Iredell H; Shaw T; Howat P; James R; Granich J
    Health Educ Res; 2004 Apr; 19(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 15031275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No difference demonstrated between faxed or mailed prenotification in promoting questionnaire response among family physicians: a randomized controlled trial.
    Gattellari M; Zwar N; Worthington JM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 May; 65(5):544-52. PubMed ID: 22445084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Telephone household screening and interviewing.
    Harlow BL; Hartge P
    Am J Epidemiol; 1983 May; 117(5):632-3. PubMed ID: 6846319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pre-notification letter type and response rate to a postal survey among women who have recently given birth.
    Todd AL; Porter M; Williamson JL; Patterson JA; Roberts CL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Dec; 15():104. PubMed ID: 26621534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of health, socio-economic position, and mode of data collection on non-response in health interview surveys.
    Ekholm O; Gundgaard J; Rasmussen NK; Hansen EH
    Scand J Public Health; 2010 Nov; 38(7):699-706. PubMed ID: 20851845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.