These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23736049)

  • 21. Review and analysis of global agricultural N₂O emissions relevant to the UK.
    Buckingham S; Anthony S; Bellamy PH; Cardenas LM; Higgins S; McGeough K; Topp CF
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jul; 487():164-72. PubMed ID: 24784741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Greenhouse gas budget (CO2, CH4 and N2O) of intensively managed grassland following restoration.
    Merbold L; Eugster W; Stieger J; Zahniser M; Nelson D; Buchmann N
    Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Jun; 20(6):1913-28. PubMed ID: 24395474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mitigation of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane emissions from manure management chains: a meta-analysis and integrated assessment.
    Hou Y; Velthof GL; Oenema O
    Glob Chang Biol; 2015 Mar; 21(3):1293-312. PubMed ID: 25330119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of CH
    Wang X; Jia M; Lin X; Xu Y; Ye X; Kao CM; Chen S
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Apr; 67(4):507-515. PubMed ID: 27996634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Greenhouse gas emissions from dairy manure management: a review of field-based studies.
    Owen JJ; Silver WL
    Glob Chang Biol; 2015 Feb; 21(2):550-65. PubMed ID: 25044806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of feeding practices and manure quality on CH
    Leitner S; Ring D; Wanyama GN; Korir D; Pelster DE; Goopy JP; Butterbach-Bahl K; Merbold L
    Waste Manag; 2021 May; 126():209-220. PubMed ID: 33774581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Methane correction factors for estimating emissions from aerobic wastewater treatment facilities based on field data in Mexico and on literature review.
    Noyola A; Paredes MG; Güereca LP; Molina LT; Zavala M
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Oct; 639():84-91. PubMed ID: 29778686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The evaluation of GHG emissions from Shanghai municipal wastewater treatment plants based on IPCC and operational data integrated methods (ODIM).
    Xi J; Gong H; Zhang Y; Dai X; Chen L
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Nov; 797():148967. PubMed ID: 34298368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Methane emissions from a landfill in north-east India: Performance of various landfill gas emission models.
    Gollapalli M; Kota SH
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Mar; 234():174-180. PubMed ID: 29175479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Greenhouse gas emissions from dairy open lot and manure stockpile in northern China: A case study.
    Ding L; Lu Q; Xie L; Liu J; Cao W; Shi Z; Li B; Wang C; Zhang G; Ren S
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Mar; 66(3):267-79. PubMed ID: 26891681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of aeration method and aeration rate on greenhouse gas emissions during composting of pig feces in pilot scale.
    Jiang T; Li G; Tang Q; Ma X; Wang G; Schuchardt F
    J Environ Sci (China); 2015 May; 31():124-32. PubMed ID: 25968266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An improved method for estimating GHG emissions from onshore oil and gas exploration and development in China.
    Chen G; Yang S; Lv C; Zhong J; Wang Z; Zhang Z; Fang X; Li S; Yang W; Xue L
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Jan; 574():707-715. PubMed ID: 27664757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Model for estimating enteric methane emissions from United States dairy and feedlot cattle.
    Kebreab E; Johnson KA; Archibeque SL; Pape D; Wirth T
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Oct; 86(10):2738-48. PubMed ID: 18539822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Forest and grassland cover types reduce net greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural soils.
    Baah-Acheamfour M; Carlyle CN; Lim SS; Bork EW; Chang SX
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Nov; 571():1115-27. PubMed ID: 27450260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Enteric methane emissions and their response to agro-ecological and livestock production systems dynamics in Zimbabwe.
    Svinurai W; Mapanda F; Sithole D; Moyo EN; Ndidzano K; Tsiga A; Zhakata W
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Mar; 616-617():710-719. PubMed ID: 29122353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [China's rice field greenhouse gas emission under climate change based on DNDC model simulation].
    Tian Z; Niu YL; Sun LX; Li CS; Liu CJ; Fan DL
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2015 Mar; 26(3):793-9. PubMed ID: 26211061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A correction in the CDM methodological tool for estimating methane emissions from solid waste disposal sites.
    Santos MM; van Elk AG; Romanel C
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Dec; 164():151-60. PubMed ID: 26363977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Agricultural soil greenhouse gas emissions: a review of national inventory methods.
    Lokupitiya E; Paustian K
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(4):1413-27. PubMed ID: 16825462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of the effect of accounting method, IPCC v. LCA, on grass-based and confinement dairy systems' greenhouse gas emissions.
    O'Brien D; Shalloo L; Patton J; Buckley F; Grainger C; Wallace M
    Animal; 2012 Sep; 6(9):1512-27. PubMed ID: 23031525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Decrease in the annual emissions of CH
    Wu L; Wu X; Shaaban M; Zhou M; Zhao J; Hu R
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 May; 25(13):13014-13025. PubMed ID: 29480394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.