These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23736050)

  • 1. Practical implementation of cost-effective genomic selection in commercial pig breeding using imputation.
    Cleveland MA; Hickey JM
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3583-92. PubMed ID: 23736050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genotype imputation from various low-density SNP panels and its impact on accuracy of genomic breeding values in pigs.
    Grossi DA; Brito LF; Jafarikia M; Schenkel FS; Feng Z
    Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2235-2245. PubMed ID: 29706144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of estimation of genomic breeding values in pigs using low-density genotypes and imputation.
    Badke YM; Bates RO; Ernst CW; Fix J; Steibel JP
    G3 (Bethesda); 2014 Apr; 4(4):623-31. PubMed ID: 24531728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genotype imputation for the prediction of genomic breeding values in non-genotyped and low-density genotyped individuals.
    Cleveland MA; Hickey JM; Kinghorn BP
    BMC Proc; 2011 May; 5 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S6. PubMed ID: 21624176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Kijas JW; van der Werf JH
    Anim Genet; 2012 Feb; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22221027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Imputation of missing single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes using a multivariate mixed model framework.
    Calus MP; Veerkamp RF; Mulder HA
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Jul; 89(7):2042-9. PubMed ID: 21357451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genotype Imputation to Improve the Cost-Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Rabbits.
    Mancin E; Sosa-Madrid BS; Blasco A; Ibáñez-Escriche N
    Animals (Basel); 2021 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33805619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of imputing markers from a low-density chip on the reliability of genomic breeding values in Holstein populations.
    Dassonneville R; Brøndum RF; Druet T; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Ducrocq V; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jul; 94(7):3679-86. PubMed ID: 21700057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic selection using low density marker panels with application to a sire line in pigs.
    Wellmann R; Preuß S; Tholen E; Heinkel J; Wimmers K; Bennewitz J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jul; 45(1):28. PubMed ID: 23895218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multi-generational imputation of single nucleotide polymorphism marker genotypes and accuracy of genomic selection.
    Toghiani S; Aggrey SE; Rekaya R
    Animal; 2016 Jul; 10(7):1077-85. PubMed ID: 27076192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design of a low-density SNP chip for the main Australian sheep breeds and its effect on imputation and genomic prediction accuracy.
    Bolormaa S; Gore K; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
    Anim Genet; 2015 Oct; 46(5):544-56. PubMed ID: 26360638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of breeding values in small genotyped populations using different sources of external information-A simulation study.
    Andonov S; Lourenco DAL; Fragomeni BO; Masuda Y; Pocrnic I; Tsuruta S; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jan; 100(1):395-401. PubMed ID: 28341049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic predictions for economically important traits in Brazilian Braford and Hereford beef cattle using true and imputed genotypes.
    Piccoli ML; Brito LF; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 28100165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Leveraging low-density crossbred genotypes to offset crossbred phenotypes and their impact on purebred predictions.
    Leite NG; Chen CY; Herring WO; Holl J; Tsuruta S; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Dec; 100(12):. PubMed ID: 36309902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assets of imputation to ultra-high density for productive and functional traits.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; Gianola D; Weigel K; Alenda R; González-Recio O
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Sep; 96(9):6047-58. PubMed ID: 23810591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interest of using imputation for genomic evaluation in layer chicken.
    Herry F; Druet DP; Hérault F; Varenne A; Burlot T; Le Roy P; Allais S
    Poult Sci; 2020 May; 99(5):2324-2336. PubMed ID: 32359567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genotype Imputation To Improve the Cost-Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Farmed Atlantic Salmon.
    Tsai HY; Matika O; Edwards SM; Antolín-Sánchez R; Hamilton A; Guy DR; Tinch AE; Gharbi K; Stear MJ; Taggart JB; Bron JE; Hickey JM; Houston RD
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Apr; 7(4):1377-1383. PubMed ID: 28250015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of alternative genotyping strategies to maximize imputation accuracy at minimal cost.
    Huang Y; Hickey JM; Cleveland MA; Maltecca C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Jul; 44(1):25. PubMed ID: 22849718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of reducing the frequency of animals genotyped at higher density on imputation and prediction accuracies using ssGBLUP1.
    Sollero BP; Howard JT; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Jul; 97(7):2780-2792. PubMed ID: 31115442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimum multistage genomic selection in dairy cattle.
    Börner V; Teuscher F; Reinsch N
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Apr; 95(4):2097-107. PubMed ID: 22459855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.