BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23737035)

  • 21. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
    Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Minilaparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: multi-institutional experience in comparison with conventional laparoscopy.
    Ghezzi F; Fanfani F; Malzoni M; Uccella S; Fagotti A; Cosentino F; Cromi A; Scambia G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1094-100. PubMed ID: 23948703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: A multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer.
    Sert BM; Boggess JF; Ahmad S; Jackson AL; Stavitzski NM; Dahl AA; Holloway RW
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 42(4):513-22. PubMed ID: 26843445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of survival and adverse events between women with stage IB1 and stage IB2 cervical cancer treated by laparoscopic radical vaginal hysterectomy.
    Hong JH; Choi JS; Lee JH; Son CE; Jeon SW; Bae JW; Eom JM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Feb; 19(2):605-11. PubMed ID: 21769469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
    Jin YM; Liu SS; Chen J; Chen YN; Ren CC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193033. PubMed ID: 29554090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, excluding robotic assisted versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Marchand G; Masoud AT; Abdelsattar A; King A; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Moir C; Moberly A; Govindan M
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):273. PubMed ID: 36609438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Efficacy of robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with that of open and laparoscopic surgery: A separate meta-analysis of high-quality studies.
    Zhang SS; Ding T; Cui ZH; Lv Y; Jiang RA
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jan; 98(4):e14171. PubMed ID: 30681582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage IB2 cervical cancer.
    Havrilesky LJ; Leath CA; Huh W; Calingaert B; Bentley RC; Soper JT; Alvarez Secord A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 May; 93(2):429-34. PubMed ID: 15099957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: a prospective randomised study comparing laparoscopic vs. open technique].
    Ramacciato G; D'Angelo F; Aurello P; Nigri G; Valabrega S; Pezzoli F; Ravaioli M; Cescon M; Cucchetti A; Lauro A; Del Gaudio M; Ercolani G
    Chir Ital; 2008; 60(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 18389741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sentinel lymph node identification and radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy.
    Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil-Moreno A; Pérez-Benavente MA; Morchón S; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):531-7. PubMed ID: 18657483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery.
    Lee CL; Huang KG; Wang CJ; Lee PS; Hwang LL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jun; 105(3):620-4. PubMed ID: 17303226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Laparoscopic versus open abdominal management of cervical cancer: long-term results from a propensity-matched analysis.
    Bogani G; Cromi A; Uccella S; Serati M; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Ghezzi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):857-62. PubMed ID: 24699300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: a matched-case comparative study.
    Kim TH; Choi CH; Choi JK; Yoon A; Lee YY; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1466-73. PubMed ID: 25207462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
    Luo C; Liu M; Li X
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):61. PubMed ID: 29716555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and abdominal surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB2/IIA2 cervical cancer.
    Chen C; Guo J; Liu P; Li Z; Jiang H; Zhu Q; Bin X; Lang J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Apr; 47(4):1516-1526. PubMed ID: 33527615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater.
    Kong TW; Chang SJ; Lee J; Paek J; Ryu HS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 24407571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Yang EJ; Kim NR; Lee AJ; Shim SH; Lee SJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Feb; 101(8):e28911. PubMed ID: 35212297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparative study of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with radical abdominal hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a long-term follow-up study.
    Lee EJ; Kang H; Kim DH
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 May; 156(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 21269754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Comparative analysis of neoadjuvant therapies in stage Ib2 and IIa2 cervical carcinoma].
    Hu JL; Wu LY; Li N; Li XG; Huang MN; Zhang R
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 47(6):452-7. PubMed ID: 22932113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.